HEALTHCARE RESOURCE UTILIZATION IN PATIENTS WITH SYMPTOMATIC COPD AND EXACERBATIONS IN CHILE- SUB-ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT TRIAL

Author(s)

Alfonso-Cristancho R1, Ismaila AS1, Schroeder M2, Gayoso M3, Caputo MA3, Di Boscio V4
1GlaxoSmithKline plc., Collegeville, PA, USA, 2GlaxoSmithKline plc., Brentford, UK, 3GlaxoSmithKline plc., Santiago, Chile, 4GlaxoSmithKline plc., Buenos Aires, Argentina

OBJECTIVES

:
Information regarding chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)-related healthcare resource utilization (HRU), particularly for moderate/severe patients from low- and middle-income countries, is limited. Here we describe HRU outcomes for patients in Chile enrolled in IMPACT.

METHODS

:
IMPACT (NCT02164513), a 52-week, phase III, global randomized controlled trial (N=10,355), evaluated fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) 100/62.5/25µg versus FF/VI 100/25µg or UMEC/VI 62.5/25µg in patients with symptomatic COPD and at least one exacerbation in the previous year. We describe demographics, clinical characteristics and HRU at baseline and during follow-up for patients in Chile. Average HRU per patient and estimated HRU annual rates are described here for outpatient, inpatient, and emergency room visits.

RESULTS

:
IMPACT enrolled 371 patients in Chile, with similar demographics and clinical characteristics to the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, but with a higher baseline use of combination treatment with inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist (ICS/LABA, 61% versus 32% [a post-hoc analysis]). Compared with the ITT population, fewer patients in Chile had severe exacerbations within the year prior to screening (16% versus 26% had 1 exacerbation; 1% versus 4% had ≥2 exacerbations), and a slightly higher proportion of moderate exacerbations (50% versus 47% had ≥2 moderate exacerbations). Overall, distributions were similar between arms.

FF/UMEC/VI reduced on-treatment moderate/severe exacerbations versus FF/VI or UMEC/VI in both Chile (47%, 55%, and 53%, respectively) and the ITT population (47%, 49%, and 50%, respectively). In Chile, on-treatment HRU per patient per year, for office visits (0.64; 0.89; 0.71), emergency room visits (0.15; 0.19; 0.40), and mean number of days in the intensive care unit (0.07; 0.16; 0.15) was lowest with FF/UMEC/VI compared to FF/VI and UMEC/VI, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

:
On-treatment exposure-adjusted exacerbation rates were lower with FF/UMEC/VI compared with the dual therapies in both the Chilean and ITT populations. Similarly, COPD-related HRU was lower with FF/UMEC/VI compared with the dual therapies for both populations.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2019-11, ISPOR Europe 2019, Copenhagen, Denmark

Code

PRS6

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Respiratory-Related Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×