TREATMENT PATTERNS AND HEALTHCARE RESOURCE UTILIZATION (HCRU) IN SECOND-LINE (2L) ADVANCED ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA IN ASIAN VERSUS WESTERN COUNTRIES
Author(s)
Jaffe D1, DeCongelio M2, Dubell A3, Stetson J4, Gricar J5
1Kantar, Jerusalem, JM, Israel, 2Kantar, Denville, NJ, USA, 3Kantar, Horsham, PA, USA, 4Kantar Health, New York, NY, USA, 5Bristol-Myers Squibb, Atlanta, GA, USA
OBJECTIVES : Esophageal cancer (EC) is the seventh most common cancer and the sixth common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Those with metastatic disease have a poor prognosis, with an 8% 5-year overall survival. This study examined treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) in patients who initiated first-line (1L) or second-line (2L) systemic therapy or received best supportive care (BSC) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with a focus on differences by Asian versus Western countries in 2L. METHODS : A global retrospective, non-interventional study was conducted among 639 physicians from Asian (Japan, Korea, Taiwan and China) and Western (US, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, UK) countries between September-October 2018. Patient characteristics and treatment-related data were collected from the 3 most recent patient medical charts for patients on 1L, 2L or BSC. Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used. RESULTS : 387 2L ESCC patients treated systemically or with BSC were profiled (West n=195; Asia n=192). The mean age was 63.4 years, and 81.4% were male with no differences by geography. Compared to Asia, Western patients were more likely to be current smokers (29.7% vs 13.5%; p=0.001), current alcohol users (31.8% vs 17.7%; p=0.002) and diagnosed as metastatic (58.5% vs 37.5%; p<0.001). At 2L, more Western patients received systemic treatment (West=63.6% vs Asia=52.6%; p=0.029) including a higher use of immunotherapy or targeted therapy (16.9% vs 3.0%; p=0.001). Taxane therapy use was similar across regions (West=42.7% vs Asia=48.5%, p=0.388), although lower rates were observed in the US (34.9%). HCRU for adverse events was lower in Western countries (e.g., ER visits=8.0% vs 22.2%; p<0.001). Following 2L systemic therapy 32.4% of patients died (West=33.1% vs Asia=31.7%; p=0.826). CONCLUSIONS : There are some differences in baseline characteristics and treatment patterns across regions with Western patients having more high-risk characteristics than Asian patients, but patient survival was similar.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2019-11, ISPOR Europe 2019, Copenhagen, Denmark
Code
PCN31
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Health Service Delivery & Process of Care
Topic Subcategory
Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Disease Management, Treatment Patterns and Guidelines
Disease
Gastrointestinal Disorders