PATIENTS' PERCEPTION OF THE QUALITY OF CONSULTATIONS MODELLED BY PATIENT-REPORTED EXPERIENCE AND HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE MEASURES
Author(s)
Brito Fernandes Ó1, Péntek M1, Gulácsi L1, Kringos D2, Klazinga N2, Murante AM3, Zrubka Z1, Lucevic A1, Baji P4
1Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary, 2Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 3Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna di Pisa, Pisa, Italy, 4Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, PE, Hungary
OBJECTIVES The study aims to explore the determinants of patients’ overall perception of quality of an outpatient consultation in Hungary, with special focus on health status and aspects of patient-reported care experiences. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional online survey among a representative sample (n=1000) of Hungary’s adult population. A subsample of 732 respondents reported to have had an outpatient consultation in the past 12 months were involved. Perception of the overall quality of the consultation was measured on a 5-item scale (poor/fair/good/very good/excellent). Respondents’ characteristics, self-reported health (5-point scale), type of care provider (GP/specialist/allied health professional; public/private) were recorded, and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) recommended by the OECD were applied. Ordinal logistic regression was used to explore associations between overall quality and PREMs, health measures and respondents’ characteristics. RESULTS : The median rating for the quality of the consultation was 4 (average: 3.8; SD: 1.1). Respondents with fair or bad/very bad health were 26% and 20% less likely to rate the consultation as excellent, compared to those that have reported a very good health. Those who have reported positive care experiences with 1) the doctor spending enough time in consultation (25%), 2) involvement in decision making (23%), 3) opportunity to ask questions (21%), and 4) provide easy to understand explanations (17%) were more likely to rate the consultation as excellent. Waiting time at a doctor’s office was a significant predictor of poorer ratings (e.g., OR=0.4 for a waiting period between 30-60 minutes). Specialist consultation at a private facility was more likely to receive significantly higher ratings. CONCLUSIONS Respondents’ self-reported health status and experiences of care were found to be important determinants of their perception of quality of a consultation in Hungary. Hence, future studies on patients’ assessment on quality of care should include these measures.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2019-11, ISPOR Europe 2019, Copenhagen, Denmark
Code
PNS397
Topic
Health Service Delivery & Process of Care, Methodological & Statistical Research, Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Patient Engagement, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes, Quality of Care Measurement, Survey Methods
Disease
No Specific Disease