Efficacy and Safety of Teprotumumab in the Treatment of Thyroid Eye Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author(s)

Singh R1, Soni P2, Chawla E3, Dabral S4, Sharma S4, Goyal R5
1IQVIA, Thane, MH, India, 2IQVIA, Delhi, DL, India, 3IQVIA, Zirakpur, PB, India, 4IQVIA, Gurgaon, HR, India, 5IQVIA, Mumbai, India

OBJECTIVES : Thyroid eye disease (TED) also known as Graves’ Orbitopathy or Ophthalmopathy – is an autoimmune condition in which the eye muscles, eyelids, tear glands and fatty tissues behind the eye become inflamed and for which no FDA approved medical therapy was available until last year. The objective of this systematic literature review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of teprotumumab for the treatment of TED by performing a meta-analysis.

METHODS : MedLine, Embase, Cochrane, clinicaltrials.gov and FDA website were searched on 25th January, 2020 for relevant placebo-controlled clinical trials with inclusion criterion of patients with TED, teprotumumab treatment, and derivable efficacy and safety outcomes. Study quality of included records was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias instruments. A meta-analysis using fixed effect model was conducted to calculate pooled effect estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for efficacy and safety outcomes.

RESULTS : Two RCTs involving 170 patients were included. Compared to placebo, teprotumumab was significantly associated with mean odds ratio of 0.05 for overall response (95% CI: 0.01, 0.27) and proptosis response (95% CI: 0.01, 0.22); and mean clinical activity score reduction of 1.58 (95% CI: 1.15, 2.01) and proptosis reduction of 2.30mm (95% CI: 1.91, 2.69) from baseline. Furthermore, teprotumumab arm showed no evidence of significant risk of treatment-emergent adverse events (Odds ratio: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.26, 1.45) and overall discontinuations (Odds ratio: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.34, 2.76) compared to placebo.

CONCLUSIONS : Teprotumumab showed significantly better clinical efficacy and safety for the treatment of thyroid eye disorder. Further high-quality RCTs and systematic reviews are required for conclusive determination of its effectiveness and tolerability compared to active comparators.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-09, ISPOR Asia Pacific 2020, Seoul, South Korea

Value in Health Regional, Volume 22S (September 2020)

Code

PDB23

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×