Penetration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) in the Randomized Controlled Setting of Oncology

Author(s)

Mangat G1, Pilkhwal N2, Sharma S2, Singh B2
1Parexel International, Chandigarh, CH, India, 2Parexel International, Mohali, India

OBJECTIVES : This review aimed to examine the literature, in particular, focusing on the extent to which the AI and ML approaches have been employed in clinical research in oncology.

METHODS : A targeted literature review was conducted from database inception through February 12, 2020. Embase® and PubMed were searched to identify studies that (1) contained a comprehensive description of any AI and ML functionality in healthcare; (2) focused on any cancer indication; and (3) were conducted in a randomized controlled (RCT) setting.

RESULTS : A total of 1,979 citations were screened. We identified 74 RCTs evaluating different applications of AI and ML in oncology. Prostate cancer was the most frequently explored (n=14 studies), followed by colorectal cancer (n=13) and lung cancer (n=8). More rarely explored were cancers of the breast (n=5 studies); esophagus and lymphocytes (n=4 each); nasopharynx and kidney (n=3 each); stomach, cervix, skin, pancreas, head & neck (n=2 each); and brain, bladder, and liver (n=1 each). We identified three major categories where algorithm tools were tested, i.e., prediction (n=37 studies), diagnosis (n=29 studies), other models (n=8 studies). Most of the studies were primarily aimed at the identification of biomarkers, risk stratification, disease severity, staging, and associated complications. Artificial neural network was the most commonly utilized algorithm (n=22 studies), followed by support vector machines (n=16), convolutional neural network (n=11), random forest (n=7), elastic net (n=5), regression (n=4), decision tree (n=2), and LASSO (n=1). Also, the number of published studies evaluating AI and ML increased by 150% between 2014 and 2020.

CONCLUSIONS : ML models and AI are promising in the field of oncology. However, its application is currently limited and still grounding on diagnostic and prognostic services. The review highlights that more efforts are needed to facilitate the implementation of relevant ML studies for testing new biomedical treatments for efficacy and safety and expanding their access.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-09, ISPOR Asia Pacific 2020, Seoul, South Korea

Value in Health Regional, Volume 22S (September 2020)

Code

PCN91

Topic

Methodological & Statistical Research

Topic Subcategory

Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Predictive Analytics

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×