Eliciting Unreported Subgroup-Specific Survival from Aggregate Randomized Controlled Trial Data

Author(s)

Alagoz O1, Xiao H2, Singh P3, Gricar J2, Dixon M2, Kurt M4
1University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA, 2Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA, 3Bristol Myers Squibb, New York, NY, USA, 4Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA

OBJECTIVES : Subgroup analyses are vital components of health technology assessments but randomized controlled trials (RCTs) do not commonly report survival distributions for subgroups. This study developed an analytical framework to elicit unreported subgroup-specific survival information from aggregate RCT data.

METHODS : Assuming exponentially-distributed subgroup survival times, we developed an optimization model which aimed to approximate the restricted mean survival time (RMST) for the overall population via weighted average of the RMSTs of two mutually exclusive and exhaustive subgroups in each arm. Reported hazard ratios from the forest plots between the arms were used to enforce the relationship among subgroups’ hazard rates in the model. The performance of the model was tested in a case study consisting of 8 RCTs in advanced stage gastrointestinal tumors (3 in hepatocellular carcinoma, 3 in gastric/gastroesophageal junction/esophageal cancer and 2 in colorectal cancer) which also reported Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves for overall survival (OS) for 40 subgroups in total. For each subgroup, predicted median survival, OS rates and the RMSTs were compared against the actual OS rates, median survival and the RMSTs as well as their 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS : Predicted median survivals and RMSTs were within the 95% CIs of the reported values in 32 and 35 out of 40 subgroups, respectively. In 8 of the subgroups, the gap between the estimated RMSTs from the predicted and the reported survival curves was less than 5%. In 6 of the subgroups, predicted survival curves laid within the 95% CIs of reported KM-curves in at least 90% of the time. Across all subgroups, on average, predicted survival curves laid within the 95% CIs of reported KM-curves in 71% of the time.

CONCLUSIONS : Our study offers a useful and reliable approach for extracting subgroup-specific survival from aggregate RCT data to better inform economic and comparative effectiveness analyses for subgroups.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2021-05, ISPOR 2021, Montreal, Canada

Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 5, S1 (May 2021)

Acceptance Code

CN2

Topic

Methodological & Statistical Research

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×