RE-EVALUATION OF THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF CASCADE SCREENING AND TREATMENT STRATEGIES FOR ADULTS WITH FAMILIAL HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA IN THE UNITED STATES

Author(s)

Zawadzki N1, Hay JW1, Ahmed CD2, Myers KD2, Wilemon K2, McGowan MP3, Gidding SS2, Knowles JW2
1University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2The FH Foundation, Pasadena, CA, USA, 3Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA

OBJECTIVES: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic disorder that leads to premature cardiovascular disease if untreated. Although it was previously thought that cascade genetic screening for FH is not cost-effective in the US, the cost of genetic testing has decreased substantially while PCSK9 inhibitors, a novel new lipid-lowering treatment, have been approved for use in FH. This study aimed to re-examine whether cascade genetic screening or cascade lipid screening is cost-effective for first-degree relatives of adults diagnosed with heterozygous FH in the US, compared to no cascade screening, and whether follow-on treatment with statins plus PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) is cost-effective, compared to high-intensity standard-of-care treatment with statins plus ezetimibe (HI-SOC).

METHODS: A decision tree was used to evaluate disease detection with the three screening strategies, while a lifetime Markov model was used to evaluate disease progression in one-year cycles until death. We report the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) in terms of costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) between six screening and treatment strategies, considering the US societal perspective.

RESULTS: At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000/QALY, cascade genetic screening, whether paired with HI-SOC or PCSK9i, is the most cost-effective screening strategy, dominating all other alternatives assessed. Compared to cascade genetic screening with HI-SOC, cascade genetic screening with PCSK9i is cost-effective with an ICER of $56,034/QALY. Results were robust in one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Baseline cholesterol levels, treatment-adjusted cholesterol levels, and diagnostic test sensitivities had the greatest impact on ICERs.

CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to incorporate lower genetic testing costs, newly available information on diagnostic test accuracy, effects of novel treatments, disease prognosis, and increased cardiovascular risk in this population. The results support cascade genetic screening for FH with subsequent HI-SOC or PCSK9i treatment as an evidence-based intervention that dominates alternative strategies and provides good value relative to costs.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-05, ISPOR 2020, Orlando, FL, USA

Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue 5, S1 (May 2020)

Acceptance Code

CC1

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Health Service Delivery & Process of Care, Medical Technologies, Methodological & Statistical Research

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Diagnostics & Imaging, Treatment Patterns and Guidelines

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders, personalized-and-precision-medicine

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×