PATIENT PRESENTATION, COMPLICATIONS AND HEALTH RESOURCE UTILIZATION ASSOCIATED WITH HARDWARE REMOVAL WITHIN 1-YEAR AFTER OPEN REDUCTION INTERNAL FIXATION OF FEMUR FRACTURES

Author(s)

Chitnis AS1, Vanderkarr M2, Amoloja T1, Folly E3, Sparks C4, Holy C5
1Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ, USA, 2DePuy Synthes, Inc., Raynham, MA, USA, 3Johnson & Johnson, Raynham, MA, USA, 4DePuy Synthes, West Chester, PA, USA, 5Johnson & Johnson, Somerville, MA, USA

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES : Despite the successful outcome of open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for femur fractures, certain patients are susceptible to complications requiring post-surgical hardware removal. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the patient characteristics, complications, and healthcare resource utilization associated with hardware removal within 1-year after ORIF.

METHODS : This retrospective observational cohort study used IBM Marketscan Commercial and Medicare databases between 2010 and 2017. Patients ≥ 18 years old, diagnosed with femur fracture, and received ORIF (index) in an inpatient setting were identified. Patients were categorized into two groups based on post-surgical hardware removal identified over 1-year period after index discharge. Patient characteristics, complication rates including infections and nonunion, healthcare resource utilization in terms of all-cause readmission, emergency visits and all-cause costs were compared post-index discharge between patients with and without hardware removal.

RESULTS : A total of 27,090 patients with ORIF for femur fractures were identified. Over the 1-year period, 6.8% patients had hardware removed. Patients with hardware removal were younger (60 vs 72 years) had lower proportion of females (60.8% vs 68.0%), had osteoarthritis (12.9% vs 10.9%), were obese (4.5% vs 2.8%), and higher length of stay (6.3 vs 5.7 days) for the index-ORIF hospitalization (All p<0.05) as compared to those without hardware removal. Patients with hardware removal had statistically significantly higher rates of infection (22.03% vs 6.7%), non-union (41.5% vs 4.4%), readmissions (60.88% vs 27.1%) (All p<0.05) except emergency visits (42.2% vs 40.2%, p= 0.091). The mean all-cause costs post-index discharge was statistically significantly higher among the patients with hardware removal ($60,171 vs $31,185, p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS : Certain patient characteristics are associated with increased risk for hardware removal after ORIF in femur fractures. Complication rates and healthcare resource utilization were significantly higher in patients requiring hardware removal after ORIF for femur fractures as compared to patients without hardware removal.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2019-05, ISPOR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 22, Issue S1 (2019 May)

Acceptance Code

CR1

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Epidemiology & Public Health

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies

Disease

Surgery

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×