The Development of a Flexible and Easy to Tailor Disease Model to Estimate the Outcomes of Treatment Sequences in Advanced Melanoma by Combining Trial and Real-World Data

Author(s)

de Groot S1, Blommestein HM2, Leeneman B2, Uyl-De Groot C2, Haanen JBAG3, Suijkerbuijk KPM4, Aarts MJB5, van den Berkmortel FWPJ6, Blank CU3, Boers-Sonderen MJ7, van den Eertwegh AJM8, de Groot JWB9, Hospers GAP10, Kapiteijn E11, de Meza MM12, Piersma D13, van Rijn RS14, Stevense-den Boer MAM15, van der Veldt AAM16, Vreugdenhil G17, Wouters MWJM3, Franken M18, van Baal PHM2
1Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands, 2Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 4University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, Netherlands, 5Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands, 6Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, Netherlands, 7Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 8Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 9Isala, Zwolle, Netherlands, 10University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands, 11Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 12Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, Netherlands, 13Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands, 14Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands, 15Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands, 16Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 17Maxima Medical Center, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 18Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: Although in the last decade many novel treatments have been introduced for advanced melanoma (unresectable stage IIIc/V) patients, evidence on the outcomes of treatment sequences is lacking. Our aim was to develop a flexible disease model for advanced melanoma to estimate long-term effectiveness of treatment sequences, to support clinical guideline development and reimbursement decision making.

METHODS: A semi-Markov model with a life-time horizon was developed. Transitions describing disease progression, next treatment and mortality were estimated from real-world data, as a function of time since start of treatment or disease progression, and patient characteristics. All transitions can be adjusted based on the relative effectiveness of treatments that were derived from a network meta-analysis. Additionally, the duration of treatment effect and time horizon can be changed to demonstrate outcomes under different assumptions.

RESULTS: The model distinguishes three active treatment lines for BRAF mutant melanoma and two active treatment lines for BRAF wild-type melanoma. Depending on treatment, mean life expectancy of BRAF mutant melanoma patients with a poor, intermediate or favourable prognosis ranged from 2.2 to 3.4, 5.6 to 7.0 and 9.9 to 11.3, respectively. Mean life expectancy of BRAF wild-type melanoma patients with a poor, intermediate or favourable prognosis ranged from 4.3 to 5.8, 5.8 to 8.2 and 7.8 to 9.7, respectively. The scenario-analyses illustrate how estimates of life expectancy crucially depend on duration of treatment effect and time horizon.

CONCLUSIONS: Our model is flexible and can be tailored to answer questions concerning (cost-)effectiveness. Treatments and sequences of treatments can be adjusted, as well as the duration of treatment effects and the transitions influenced by treatment effect. With this model, we show how to combine real-world data with data from clinical trials to benefit most from the advantages of both data sources, which can guide the development of future disease models.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2021-11, ISPOR Europe 2021, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 12, S2 (December 2021)

Acceptance Code

P71

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation, Health Policy & Regulatory, Methodological & Statistical Research

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Reimbursement & Access Policy

Disease

Oncology

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×