Use of Real-World Big Data to Assess the Effectiveness on Overall Survival Among Chemotherapy or Immunotherapy in First Line Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Patients in an Italian Setting

Author(s)

Degli Espositi L1, Sangiorgi D2, Ancona DD3, Andretta M4, Barbieri A5, Bartolini F6, Cavaliere A7, Chinellato A8, Ciaccia A9, Cillo MR10, Citraro R11, Costantini A12, De Francesco A11, Dell'Orco S13, Di Manno G13, Ferrante F14, Gentile S15, Lavalle A15, Moscogiuri R16, Pastorello M17, Procacci C3, Re D18, Santoleri F12, Ubertazzo L19, Vercellone A20, Perrone V21, Dovizio M2
1CliCon S.r.l. Health, Economics & Outcomes Research, Ravenna, Italy, 2CliCon S.r.l. Health, Economics & Outcomes Research, Bologna, BO, Italy, 3ASL BAT, Trani, Italy, 4Azienda ULSS 8 Berica, Vicenza, Italy, 5ASL Vercelli, Vercelli, Italy, 6USL Umbria 2, Terni, Italy, 7ASL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy, 8Azienda ULSS 3 Serenissima, Mestre (VE), Italy, 9ASL Foggia, Foggia, Italy, 10ASL Salerno, Salerno, Italy, 11Azienda ospedaliero-universitaria Mater Domini, Catanzaro, Italy, 12ASL Pescara, Pescara, Italy, 13ASL Roma 6, Albano Laziale, Italy, 14ASL Frosinone, Frosinone, Italy, 15Direzione Generale per la Salute Regione Molise, Campobasso, Italy, 16ASL Taranto, Taranto, Italy, 17ASP Palermo, Palermo, Italy, 18ASL Teramo, Teramo, Italy, 19ASL Roma 4, Civitavecchia (RM), Italy, 20ASL Napoli 3 SUD, Torre del Greco, Italy, 21CliCon S.r.l. Health, Economics & Outcomes Research, Bologna, Italy

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: The use of big data to assess the effectiveness of oncological treatments in clinical practice is gaining increasing interest. This analysis aimed to assess the overall survival of metastatic non-small cell lung (met-NSCLC) patients receiving chemotherapy (CT) or immunotherapy (I/O) as 1st line by using real-world data in a sample population in Italy.

METHODS: A retrospective observational analysis based on administrative data from a sample of Italian Local Health Units was conducted. Met-NSCLC patients starting a 1st line therapy with CT or I/O between 2017-2018 were identified. Stopping inclusion period up to 2018 enabled at least a two-years follow-up period for each included patient. Kaplan Meier overall survival analysis considered time (months) from therapy initiation to death. Multivariable analysis was performed to adjust for cofounders such as age, gender, metastasis, BRAF test prescription and pharmacological treatments.

RESULTS: A total of 3,126 (mean age±SD 68.6±9.8 years, 68.2% male) and 316 (mean age±SD 68.6±9.7 years, 74.4% male) patients initiated treatment with CT and I/O respectively. In both groups, the more frequent metastases detected were related to lymph nodes (42.1% CT, 24.1% I/O), bone (25.8% CT, 14.9% I/O) and brain (18.3% CT, 10.1% I/O). Median [95%CI] survival was 8.0 [7.4-8.6] and 14.6 [12.2-18.9] months for CT and I/O patients, respectively. Death was not reported in 31.2% of CT and in 44.3% of I/O cohorts. Multivariable analysis showed the risk of death to be significantly lower in patients treated with I/O compared to CT (HR [95%CI] 0.796 [0.681-0.930]).

CONCLUSIONS: Results from our study showed among met-NSCL patients in 1stline a better overall survival of the I/O compared to CT patients and a reduced risk of death of I/O vs CT-treated patients. Our findings suggest real-world data could produce valuable insights into treatments and their outcomes in routine daily oncology practice, thus integrating the evidence from clinical trials.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2021-11, ISPOR Europe 2021, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 12, S2 (December 2021)

Acceptance Code

P13

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×