VALUE-TO-ACCESS (V2A): AN HTA FRAMEWORK FOR AI-ENABLED PRECISION MEDICINE
Author(s)
Kuldeep Patil, M. Pharm.1, Harshal Rajendra Chaudhari, M. Pharm.1, Venkata Sharmila Uribandi, M. Pharm.2, Richa Goyal, M. Pharm., PhD2.
1NIPER S.A.S Nagar, Mohali, India, 2Dual Sphere Consulting Pte. Ltd., Hougang, Singapore.
1NIPER S.A.S Nagar, Mohali, India, 2Dual Sphere Consulting Pte. Ltd., Hougang, Singapore.
OBJECTIVES: HTA frameworks built for drugs and devices poorly assess AI-enabled precision medicine—diagnostics, biomarker stratification, and response prediction—because these technologies are data- and context-dependent, often rely on single-arm or surrogate evidence, and evolve post-deployment; we developed Value-to-Access (V2A) to make this value evidence decision-ready for reimbursement.
METHODS: We conducted a structured synthesis of peer-reviewed and grey literature (2018-2026) sourced from ISPOR/Value in Health, npj Digital Medicine, The Lancet Digital Health, the Journal of Medical Internet Research, and EU and US regulatory bodies in five HTA domains: clinical effectiveness, economics, safety, organisational impact, and ethics/equity. We mapped findings to assessment methods—cost-utility analysis, multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA), outcome-based agreements, and conditional reimbursement—and appraised them against the CHEERS 2022 economic-reporting standard, feasibility, transferability, and applicability.
RESULTS: V2A comprises four modules plus a cross-cutting AI layer. The evidence-readiness module sets clinical-validity and utility thresholds and accommodates single-arm/surrogate evidence and generalizability concerns. The economic module reframes cost-effectiveness around diagnostic-accuracy-driven value, capturing downstream treatment consequences, implementation and infrastructure costs, and lifecycle reassessment for adaptive technologies. The broader-value module applies MCDA to equity, organisational impact, and transparency. The access-linkage module ties evidence maturity to reimbursement pathways—robust evidence to standard appraisal, residual uncertainty to conditional, monitoring-linked agreements—consistent with the EU HTA Regulation. The cross-cutting layer addresses AI-specific traits (data-dependence, retraining, context sensitivity) and supports AI-assisted evidence synthesis for resource-limited agencies. Applied to precision-oncology cases, V2A converts AI-specific uncertainty into decision-ready evidence suitable for conditional access.
CONCLUSIONS: V2A offers agencies a transparent method to assess AI-enabled precision medicine and developers a value-oriented route to market; we recommend prospective, multi-jurisdictional validation as the next step.
METHODS: We conducted a structured synthesis of peer-reviewed and grey literature (2018-2026) sourced from ISPOR/Value in Health, npj Digital Medicine, The Lancet Digital Health, the Journal of Medical Internet Research, and EU and US regulatory bodies in five HTA domains: clinical effectiveness, economics, safety, organisational impact, and ethics/equity. We mapped findings to assessment methods—cost-utility analysis, multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA), outcome-based agreements, and conditional reimbursement—and appraised them against the CHEERS 2022 economic-reporting standard, feasibility, transferability, and applicability.
RESULTS: V2A comprises four modules plus a cross-cutting AI layer. The evidence-readiness module sets clinical-validity and utility thresholds and accommodates single-arm/surrogate evidence and generalizability concerns. The economic module reframes cost-effectiveness around diagnostic-accuracy-driven value, capturing downstream treatment consequences, implementation and infrastructure costs, and lifecycle reassessment for adaptive technologies. The broader-value module applies MCDA to equity, organisational impact, and transparency. The access-linkage module ties evidence maturity to reimbursement pathways—robust evidence to standard appraisal, residual uncertainty to conditional, monitoring-linked agreements—consistent with the EU HTA Regulation. The cross-cutting layer addresses AI-specific traits (data-dependence, retraining, context sensitivity) and supports AI-assisted evidence synthesis for resource-limited agencies. Applied to precision-oncology cases, V2A converts AI-specific uncertainty into decision-ready evidence suitable for conditional access.
CONCLUSIONS: V2A offers agencies a transparent method to assess AI-enabled precision medicine and developers a value-oriented route to market; we recommend prospective, multi-jurisdictional validation as the next step.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2026-11, ISPOR Europe 2026, Vienna, Austria
Value in Health, Volume 29, Issue 12S
Code
HTA359
Topic
Health Policy & Regulatory, Health Technology Assessment, Medical Technologies
Topic Subcategory
Decision & Deliberative Processes
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Personalized & Precision Medicine