RECAST-DEMENTIA: A REGISTER-BASED ECONOMIC COST AND SEQUENCE TRANSFORMER FOR DEMENTIA CARE COST FORECASTING USING SWEDISH REGISTER DATA

Author(s)

Yassine Turki, MSc1, Sandar Aye, MSc, PhD1, Anders Wimo, MD, PhD1, Ron Handels, PhD2, Xin Xia, MSc, PhD1, Yohannes Mengistu Balcha, MD, MSc1, Emil Aho, MSc1, Linus Jönsson, MSc, PhD, MD3.
1Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, 2Maastricht University, maastricht, Netherlands, 3Karolinska Insitutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a time-aware transformer model applied on linked Swedish registers improves forecasting of 12-month post-index dementia care costs beyond conventional regression-based models.
METHODS: National healthcare, prescription and social care records were linked and converted to dated event sequences. RECAST-Dementia applies a sequence transformer with a gamma cost head to generate one person level mean forecast from pre-index history alone. Internal validation included 81,978 individuals alive on 1 January 2024 with at least 1 year of pre-index data. The outcome was censored register-priced cost summed from index until 12 months, death, or end of observation. The comparator was a Gamma generalized linear model with binary indicators for pre-index event occurrence. Accuracy was summarised by mean absolute error, cohort mean bias with 95% confidence intervals, coefficient of determination, and Spearman rank correlation.
RESULTS: Mean observed post-index cost was 120.5 kSEK. RECAST-Dementia achieved mean absolute error 50.9 kSEK, mean bias −0.5 kSEK (95% CI −1.4 to 0.4), coefficient of determination 0.764, and Spearman correlation 0.712; mean predicted cost was 120.0 kSEK. The Gamma GLM achieved mean absolute error 119.9 kSEK, mean bias +24.1 kSEK (95% CI 21.3 to 26.9), and Spearman correlation 0.629. Observed costs were highly concentrated: the highest-spending 10% accounted for 74.4% of total spending.
CONCLUSIONS: Time-aware transformer modelling improved absolute and rank-based forecast accuracy relative to a pre-specified non-sequential Gamma comparator in this Swedish internal validation cohort. Results may inform budget forecasting and identification of costly trajectories, but require external validation before broader policy application and do not establish cost-effectiveness or causal treatment effects.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2026-11, ISPOR Europe 2026, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Volume 29, Issue 12S

Code

EE670

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Methodological & Statistical Research

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies

Disease

Geriatrics, Neurological Disorders

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×