REAL-WORLD EVIDENCE ON ORAL CLADRIBINE IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS: CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS, TREATMENT PATTERNS AND ECONOMIC BURDEN
Author(s)
Daniela Martins, PharmD, Ines Rosario, PharmD, Raquel Simões, PharmD, João Paulo Cruz, PhD.
Unidade Local de Saúde Santa Maria, Lisboa, Portugal.
Unidade Local de Saúde Santa Maria, Lisboa, Portugal.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the long-term clinical effectiveness, treatment patterns, durability of disease control, and drug acquisition costs of oral cladribine in a real-world cohort of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).
METHODS: A retrospective single-center observational study included patients with MS initiating cladribine between 2018 and 2024 at a tertiary referral center. Demographic, clinical and treatment data were extracted from medical records via hospital system (Glintt®). Outcomes included treatment completion, clinical stability, retreatment, subsequent disease-modifying therapy (DMT) and drug costs.
RESULTS: A total of 143 patients were included; 75,5% were female and the median age at cladribine initiation was 44 years (range19-70). Overall 18,9% of patients did not complete treatment due to failure (33,3%), dropout (29,6%) and 25,9% ongoing treatment. Among 116 patients completed treatment, 68,1% remained clinically stable, 19,8% switched to another DMT, 10,3% required retreatment, and 1,8% transferred center. Retreatment occurred predominantly during year 4 (41,7%). Twenty-six patients (18,2%) were treatment-naïve, while the remainder most commonly switched from dimethyl fumarate (24,8%), teriflunomide (18,8%) and interferon beta (16,2%). Among patients initiating a subsequent DMT, 39.2% transitioned to ofatumumab and 34,8% to ocrelizumab. In patients completing two cladribine courses, 43.1% remained clinically stable for >4 years, including 7.0% who maintained stability for 7 years. Durable disease stability (>48 months) was most frequently observed when cladribine was initiated as a second or third-line therapy (32% each). Mean annual drug costs among treatment-free patients declined from €8,136 during Years 3-4 to €4,649 in Year 7. At 48 months, cumulative cladribine costs were 28.6% and 33.2% lower than first- and second-line DMTs, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world cohort, cladribine was associated with sustained long-term clinical stability, prolonged treatment-free intervals and lower cumulative drug costs than conventional DMT treatment sequences. Durable outcomes and lower long-term costs highlight the potential cladribine’s value as an efficient MS treatment strategy.
METHODS: A retrospective single-center observational study included patients with MS initiating cladribine between 2018 and 2024 at a tertiary referral center. Demographic, clinical and treatment data were extracted from medical records via hospital system (Glintt®). Outcomes included treatment completion, clinical stability, retreatment, subsequent disease-modifying therapy (DMT) and drug costs.
RESULTS: A total of 143 patients were included; 75,5% were female and the median age at cladribine initiation was 44 years (range19-70). Overall 18,9% of patients did not complete treatment due to failure (33,3%), dropout (29,6%) and 25,9% ongoing treatment. Among 116 patients completed treatment, 68,1% remained clinically stable, 19,8% switched to another DMT, 10,3% required retreatment, and 1,8% transferred center. Retreatment occurred predominantly during year 4 (41,7%). Twenty-six patients (18,2%) were treatment-naïve, while the remainder most commonly switched from dimethyl fumarate (24,8%), teriflunomide (18,8%) and interferon beta (16,2%). Among patients initiating a subsequent DMT, 39.2% transitioned to ofatumumab and 34,8% to ocrelizumab. In patients completing two cladribine courses, 43.1% remained clinically stable for >4 years, including 7.0% who maintained stability for 7 years. Durable disease stability (>48 months) was most frequently observed when cladribine was initiated as a second or third-line therapy (32% each). Mean annual drug costs among treatment-free patients declined from €8,136 during Years 3-4 to €4,649 in Year 7. At 48 months, cumulative cladribine costs were 28.6% and 33.2% lower than first- and second-line DMTs, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world cohort, cladribine was associated with sustained long-term clinical stability, prolonged treatment-free intervals and lower cumulative drug costs than conventional DMT treatment sequences. Durable outcomes and lower long-term costs highlight the potential cladribine’s value as an efficient MS treatment strategy.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2026-11, ISPOR Europe 2026, Vienna, Austria
Value in Health, Volume 29, Issue 12S
Code
CO198
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Clinician Reported Outcomes
Disease
Neurological Disorders