COST-EFFECTIVENESS AND COST-UTILITY OF HIGH-DOSE INACTIVATED INFLUENZA VACCINE VERSUS STANDARD-DOSE INACTIVATED INFLUENZA VACCINE IN THE OLDER ADULTS AGED =65 YEARS IN POLAND

Author(s)

Arvind Bhushan, MBA1, Marta Nowak, MSc2, Gerald Moncayo, PhD3.
1HEVA Vaccines, Sanofi, Hyderabad, India, 2Vaccines, Sanofi, Warsaw, Poland, 3Vaccines, Sanofi, Lyon, France.
OBJECTIVES: Influenza poses a substantial clinical burden in older adults (aged ≥65 years), with an increased risk of complications, hospitalization, and death. High-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (HD-IIV) has demonstrated superior immunogenicity and clinical effectiveness compared with standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV influenza vaccination strategies among older adults aged ≥65 years in Poland from the healthcare perspective.
METHODS: A validated decision-analytic influenza model was adapted using Polish-specific inputs for each vaccination strategy over one influenza season. Clinical inputs were derived from randomized controlled trials and published real-world evidence. The model estimated influenza cases, general practitioner (GP) visits, hospitalizations, deaths, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and associated costs. The base case considered hospitalizations conditional on influenza. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were expressed as Polish złoty (PLN) per QALYs gained. Sensitivity analyses explored variations in parameters.
RESULTS: In the influenza specific base case, implementing HD-IIV instead of SD-IIV averted 14,719 influenza cases, 5,417 GP visits, 570 hospitalisations, and ~190 deaths, resulting in gains of 1,719 life-years (LYs) and 1,465 QALYs. The ICER was PLN 85,090 per LY gained and PLN 99,834 per QALY gained, below the WHO-recommended threshold of PLN 244,821 (3 times GDP per capita). Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness, with results most sensitive to relative efficacy of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV, HD-IIV vaccine cost, and influenza-attributable mortality
CONCLUSIONS: HD-IIV is a cost-effective strategy over SD-IIV for older adults aged ≥65 years in Poland. Notably, expansion of the analytical scope to include cardiorespiratory benefits would be anticipated to generate significantly lower ICERs, thereby improving the overall cost-effectiveness profile. These findings could guide payers in evaluating HD-IIV for inclusion in Poland's immunization strategy, potentially improving health outcomes in older adults aged ≥65 years.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2026-11, ISPOR Europe 2026, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Volume 29, Issue 12S

Code

EE746

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Epidemiology & Public Health, Health Technology Assessment

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Vaccines

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×