CHALLENGE OF ATMP REIMBURSEMENT AND PATIENT ACCESS IN A CHANGING UK LANDSCAPE
Author(s)
Ben Barron-Millar, PhD, Malcolm Boyd, MSc.
Kintiga, Papworth Everard, United Kingdom.
Kintiga, Papworth Everard, United Kingdom.
OBJECTIVES: Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) present significant challenges for health technology assessment (HTA), driven by high upfront costs, immature evidence, and uncertainty around long‑term outcomes. England has implemented flexible appraisal pathways and managed access mechanisms, to enable access while mitigating considerable uncertainty. This study describes National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) reimbursement outcomes for ATMPs in England with a focus on reimbursed indication alignment with marketing authorisation (MA) versus optimisation, and the rationale for managed access.
METHODS: A retrospective HTA trend analysis of ATMP NICE reimbursement outcomes was conducted up to June 2026. Variables extracted included therapeutic area, indication, MA, NICE appraisal pathway, reimbursement outcome, use of managed access, and reported decision drivers.
RESULTS: To date, 14 ATMP treatments have been evaluated by NICE, generating 18 reimbursement recommendations due to multiple indications per agent. In terms of HTA routing, five highly specialised technology (HST) appraisals and 13 standard technology appraisals (STAs) were reported, with 50% (n=9) being ‘optimised’ for reimbursed indication versus original MA. This definition of target subpopulations allowed the HTA to highlight patient populations with the highest unmet need and most plausible cost‑effectiveness. The most common indications were oncology and/or haematology related (n=10), driven largely by CAR‑T therapies for aggressive B‑cell lymphomas. Of the appraised ATMP indications, routine commissioning was recommended (n=9) as well as optimised/restricted outcomes (n=9). Overall, 9 ATMP indications have entered into managed access arrangements, primarily to address uncertainty in long‑term durability, immature survival data, and reliance on single‑arm studies.
CONCLUSIONS: NICE is enabling access to ATMPs despite uncertainty, but only through systematic use of population restriction and managed access, effectively reshaping reimbursement into a conditional, evidence-generating process. This reflects a broader shift toward an adaptive HTA model, where earlier access is balanced against risk by targeting high-value patients and deferring evidentiary certainty over time.
METHODS: A retrospective HTA trend analysis of ATMP NICE reimbursement outcomes was conducted up to June 2026. Variables extracted included therapeutic area, indication, MA, NICE appraisal pathway, reimbursement outcome, use of managed access, and reported decision drivers.
RESULTS: To date, 14 ATMP treatments have been evaluated by NICE, generating 18 reimbursement recommendations due to multiple indications per agent. In terms of HTA routing, five highly specialised technology (HST) appraisals and 13 standard technology appraisals (STAs) were reported, with 50% (n=9) being ‘optimised’ for reimbursed indication versus original MA. This definition of target subpopulations allowed the HTA to highlight patient populations with the highest unmet need and most plausible cost‑effectiveness. The most common indications were oncology and/or haematology related (n=10), driven largely by CAR‑T therapies for aggressive B‑cell lymphomas. Of the appraised ATMP indications, routine commissioning was recommended (n=9) as well as optimised/restricted outcomes (n=9). Overall, 9 ATMP indications have entered into managed access arrangements, primarily to address uncertainty in long‑term durability, immature survival data, and reliance on single‑arm studies.
CONCLUSIONS: NICE is enabling access to ATMPs despite uncertainty, but only through systematic use of population restriction and managed access, effectively reshaping reimbursement into a conditional, evidence-generating process. This reflects a broader shift toward an adaptive HTA model, where earlier access is balanced against risk by targeting high-value patients and deferring evidentiary certainty over time.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2026-11, ISPOR Europe 2026, Vienna, Austria
Value in Health, Volume 29, Issue 12S
Code
HTA376
Topic
Health Policy & Regulatory, Health Technology Assessment, Study Approaches
Topic Subcategory
Decision & Deliberative Processes
Disease
Genetic, Regenerative & Curative Therapies, No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas