AN ANALYSIS OF IV-TO-SUBCUTANEOUS ONCOLOGY DRUG TRANSITIONS FRAMED BY IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE: WHY CLINICAL EFFICACY ALONE FAILS TO DRIVE ADOPTION

Author(s)

Camille Chassat, BSc, MSc, Abbie Hewson, MSci, James Cochrane, BSc, Ashley Enstone, MRes, BSc, Daisy Bridge, MRes, BSc.
Adelphi Values PROVE, Bollington, United Kingdom.
OBJECTIVES: Subcutaneous (SC) formulations offer reduced administration time, improved convenience and healthcare system (HCS) efficiency. However, real-world adoption varies dramatically despite clinical equivalence, suggesting clinical efficacy alone does not drive successful implementation of alternative formulations. This research aimed to summarise the barriers to adopting SC formulations of approved products, and proposed solutions to support real-world adoption.
METHODS: IV oncology drugs with approved equivalent SC formulation were identified through targeted searches of regulatory and technology appraisals in the UK, France, Germany, Canada and the US. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was applied to systematically map barriers and enablers of transitioning to SC formulations across five domains: Intervention Characteristics, Outer Setting, Inner Setting, Characteristics of Individuals, and Implementation Process.
RESULTS: Nine products with IV and SC formulations were identified. Real-world adoption varied dramatically: >95% for some agents within 4 weeks of implementation versus restricted access for others despite clinical equivalence. Using the CFIR, adoption barriers spanned five domains: Individual (prescriber inertia, clinician knowledge gaps); Organizational (electronic medical record/formulary delays, workflow complexity); System-level (restrictive reimbursement policies); Intervention (perceived loss of clinician oversight); and Process (inadequate training infrastructure). Key enablers of transitioning to SC included multidisciplinary leadership engagement, structured education programs, quantified operational benefits (chair time reduction), and patient preference (up to 92% preferring SC over IV). Critically, adoption success correlated with formal implementation frameworks rather than clinical efficacy alone, suggesting system-level factors are a key determinant of real-world adoption.
CONCLUSIONS: Transitioning patients to SC formulations in oncology represent opportunities for patient-centred care and system efficiency. Tailored implementation strategies are critical for maximizing adoption. Incorporating CFIR-guided frameworks into clinical practice decisions could accelerate adoption, reduce equity gaps, and ensure consistent access to formulation innovations across diverse HCS worldwide.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2026-11, ISPOR Europe 2026, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Volume 29, Issue 12S

Code

HSD112

Topic

Health Service Delivery & Process of Care

Disease

Oncology

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×