ALTERNATIVE ACCESS MODELS FOR ANTI-OBESITY MEDICINES IN JAPAN UNDER REIMBURSEMENT CONSTRAINTS

Author(s)

Sama Seyedmousavi, MSc, MRes, Lucy Forrester, MBioEnt, Lucrezia Della Loggia, MSc, Sara Cueva Oemer, MSc.
Inbeeo Ltd, London, United Kingdom.
OBJECTIVES: Public healthcare systems outside the US face increasing pressure to fund innovative therapies due to constrained budgets, growing patient demand, and restrictive reimbursement pathways. In parallel, digital healthcare platforms and patient consumerism are increasing the feasibility of alternative access models outside traditional reimbursement systems. Obesity represents an important case study due to high patient demand and feasible primary-care delivery pathways. Japan is of particular interest because constrained broad access to anti-obesity medicines under universal healthcare coverage is driving the emergence of hybrid access models. This research aims to assess how manufacturers are adapting access strategies for novel anti-obesity medicines in Japan.
METHODS: Targeted secondary research was undertaken to assess access strategies used by manufacturers of two novel anti-obesity medicines in Japan. Publicly available sources were reviewed, including reimbursement and policy publications, company and market reports, and materials from digital healthcare and private clinic platforms.
RESULTS: Manufacturers adopted four broad categories of strategies to enable access to anti-obesity medicines outside universal healthcare coverage in Japan: (1) alternative access channels, by supporting access through self-pay clinics and digital healthcare platforms; (2) responsible-use initiatives, including prescribing measures to promote appropriate use and continuity of care; (3) ecosystem development through partnership with government bodies, municipalities, and medical societies to strength care pathways and disease awareness; and (4) commercial optimization through domestic partnerships and dual branding approached for multi indication therapies. Together, these approaches complemented traditional reimbursement pathways and facilitated access outside universal healthcare coverage.
CONCLUSIONS: Alternative access models are becoming increasingly relevant where public reimbursement alone may not support broad access to high-demand therapies. Obesity may represent an early case study for wider adoption of these approaches. Future anti-obesity therapies and other comparable therapy areas may increasingly adopt similar access strategies alongside traditional reimbursement models.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2026-11, ISPOR Europe 2026, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Volume 29, Issue 12S

Code

HPR225

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory, Health Service Delivery & Process of Care

Topic Subcategory

Insurance Systems & National Health Care, Pricing Policy & Schemes, Reimbursement & Access Policy

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders (including obesity)

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×