ECONOMIC EVIDENCE FOR TACROLIMUS IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS: A TARGETED LITERATURE REVIEW TO SUPPORT UK COST-EFFECTIVENESS MODELING
Author(s)
Matthew Lyall, BSc1, Luke Stainer, BSc, MSc2, You-Ren Chou, MSc2, Thomas Snell, MSc2, Georgina Glover, BSc1, Danielah Prescott, Msci1, Richard David Stork, BSc, MSc1.
1Chiesi Ltd, Manchester, United Kingdom, 2Tolley Ltd, Buxton, United Kingdom.
1Chiesi Ltd, Manchester, United Kingdom, 2Tolley Ltd, Buxton, United Kingdom.
OBJECTIVES: Tacrolimus is licensed for immunosuppressive therapy in adult patients who have received a kidney transplant (KTx). Envarsus® is an extended-release form of tacrolimus, that may offer clinical and economic benefits in fast metaboliser patients who require high doses of immunosuppression to maintain efficacy. A targeted literature review was conducted to identify economic, HCRU, and HRQoL evidence to inform cost-effectiveness modelling and the relative value of Envarsus®.
METHODS: A targeted search of the PubMed database (January 2015-January 2026) was conducted. Eligible records included economic evaluations, and HCRU and HRQoL studies in adult KTx recipients. Study selection followed predefined inclusion criteria, prioritising UK-based evidence.
RESULTS: Of 2,076 records identified, 90 met the eligibility criteria, and 17 were synthesised. Tacrolimus-based regimens were consistently identified as the most cost-effective immunosuppressive strategy versus comparators; however, substantial heterogeneity within prolonged-release tacrolimus (PR-TAC) formulations was observed. Evidence indicated that Envarsus® achieves similar health outcomes (QALYs) to immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-TAC) at broadly comparable costs, suggesting economic parity. In contrast, evidence for Envarsus suggested a trend towards improved effectiveness (higher QALYs) alongside lower or comparable costs compared to Advagraf® (PR-TAC), indicating a favourable cost-effectiveness profile. Subgroup analyses highlighted pharmacokinetic variability as an important driver of outcomes, with Envarsus® associated with greater QALY gains in fast metabolisers. HRQoL improved post-transplant (EQ‑5D: ~0.64-0.77 pre-transplant versus 0.78-0.90 post-transplant). HCRU data confirmed high upfront transplant costs and substantial long-term costs associated with graft failure and transplant complications, correlated with pharmacokinetic variability.
CONCLUSIONS: Identified literature suggests that Envarsus® should be considered distinct from other TAC‑PR formulations with clinical and economic advantages, particularly in fast metabolisers. These findings support consideration of Envarsus® as a distinct intervention in future modelling. Key UK data gaps remain but do not preclude further economic evaluation, including subgroup analyses in fast metabolisers.
METHODS: A targeted search of the PubMed database (January 2015-January 2026) was conducted. Eligible records included economic evaluations, and HCRU and HRQoL studies in adult KTx recipients. Study selection followed predefined inclusion criteria, prioritising UK-based evidence.
RESULTS: Of 2,076 records identified, 90 met the eligibility criteria, and 17 were synthesised. Tacrolimus-based regimens were consistently identified as the most cost-effective immunosuppressive strategy versus comparators; however, substantial heterogeneity within prolonged-release tacrolimus (PR-TAC) formulations was observed. Evidence indicated that Envarsus® achieves similar health outcomes (QALYs) to immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-TAC) at broadly comparable costs, suggesting economic parity. In contrast, evidence for Envarsus suggested a trend towards improved effectiveness (higher QALYs) alongside lower or comparable costs compared to Advagraf® (PR-TAC), indicating a favourable cost-effectiveness profile. Subgroup analyses highlighted pharmacokinetic variability as an important driver of outcomes, with Envarsus® associated with greater QALY gains in fast metabolisers. HRQoL improved post-transplant (EQ‑5D: ~0.64-0.77 pre-transplant versus 0.78-0.90 post-transplant). HCRU data confirmed high upfront transplant costs and substantial long-term costs associated with graft failure and transplant complications, correlated with pharmacokinetic variability.
CONCLUSIONS: Identified literature suggests that Envarsus® should be considered distinct from other TAC‑PR formulations with clinical and economic advantages, particularly in fast metabolisers. These findings support consideration of Envarsus® as a distinct intervention in future modelling. Key UK data gaps remain but do not preclude further economic evaluation, including subgroup analyses in fast metabolisers.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2026-11, ISPOR Europe 2026, Vienna, Austria
Value in Health, Volume 29, Issue 12S
Code
EE591
Topic
Economic Evaluation, Health Service Delivery & Process of Care
Topic Subcategory
Novel & Social Elements of Value
Disease
Urinary/Kidney Disorders