CHARACTERIZING THE PRE-DIAGNOSTIC WORKUP GAP IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED TESTICULAR CANCER IN MALES AGED 15-45: ANALYSIS OF US REAL-WORLD DATA
Author(s)
Michael J. Rovito, PhD, CHES, CMHE1, Monica K. Silver, PhD, MPH2, Christopher M. Adams, MPH2, Mike Craycraft, RPh3, Janna Manjelievskaia, MPH, PhD2.
1University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA, 2Veradigm, Raleigh, NC, USA, 3The Testicular Cancer Society, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
1University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA, 2Veradigm, Raleigh, NC, USA, 3The Testicular Cancer Society, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
OBJECTIVES: Testicular Cancer (TCa) is the most common solid malignancy among young men. TCa’s favorable prognosis is highly stage dependent yet diagnostic delay has been a recognized problem for over four decades. Few studies have leveraged large-scale, nationally representative samples to characterize the pre-diagnostic workup patterns for TCa. We sought to understand the diagnostic journey of newly diagnosed males with TCa using real-world US EHR linked to claims data.
METHODS: This study used the Veradigm Network EHR linked to Komodo administrative claims to identify males aged 15-45 with a new TCa diagnosis between 01/01/2024-03/07/2026. Earliest TCa diagnosis=index date. Males with a history of TCa prior to index date were excluded. Using all available patient history, the presence of relevant lab testing (AFP, LDH, B-HcG) and procedures (CT scan, ultrasound, orchiectomy) prior to diagnosis were examined. Additionally, time from initial complaint (ER and office visits with related symptoms, including but not limited to: back pain, groin pain, swelling, night sweats) to diagnosis date was calculated. The presence of visits with a documented TCa screening prior to diagnosis was also captured.
RESULTS: A total of 4,302 patients were included in the analysis. Less than a third (26%) had a procedure for a CT scan (abdomen, pelvis, or chest) any time prior to TCa diagnosis. Approximately 10% had an AFP lab result, and <10% had an LDH (9.3%) or B-HcG (8.7%) lab result. Less than 5% had documented evidence of pelvic/perineal pain or swelling prior to the diagnosis date and 0.5% had a TCa screening.
CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis of US real world data in males with newly diagnosed TCa found that diagnostic workups are lacking. A majority of males had no evidence of relevant labs or procedures prior to the diagnosis date and <1% had evidence of a documented visit with TCa screening.
METHODS: This study used the Veradigm Network EHR linked to Komodo administrative claims to identify males aged 15-45 with a new TCa diagnosis between 01/01/2024-03/07/2026. Earliest TCa diagnosis=index date. Males with a history of TCa prior to index date were excluded. Using all available patient history, the presence of relevant lab testing (AFP, LDH, B-HcG) and procedures (CT scan, ultrasound, orchiectomy) prior to diagnosis were examined. Additionally, time from initial complaint (ER and office visits with related symptoms, including but not limited to: back pain, groin pain, swelling, night sweats) to diagnosis date was calculated. The presence of visits with a documented TCa screening prior to diagnosis was also captured.
RESULTS: A total of 4,302 patients were included in the analysis. Less than a third (26%) had a procedure for a CT scan (abdomen, pelvis, or chest) any time prior to TCa diagnosis. Approximately 10% had an AFP lab result, and <10% had an LDH (9.3%) or B-HcG (8.7%) lab result. Less than 5% had documented evidence of pelvic/perineal pain or swelling prior to the diagnosis date and 0.5% had a TCa screening.
CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis of US real world data in males with newly diagnosed TCa found that diagnostic workups are lacking. A majority of males had no evidence of relevant labs or procedures prior to the diagnosis date and <1% had evidence of a documented visit with TCa screening.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2026-11, ISPOR Europe 2026, Vienna, Austria
Value in Health, Volume 29, Issue 12S
Code
CO161
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Health Service Delivery & Process of Care
Topic Subcategory
Clinical Outcomes Assessment
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Oncology