ALIGNING NATIONAL AND EUROPEAN HTA REQUIREMENTS: A COMPARISON OF THE POLISH HTA GUIDELINES AND METHODOLOGY FOR JOINT CLINICAL ASSESSMENTS

Author(s)

Anna Kaczorek-Juszkiewicz, MA, Kinga Orzel, MA, Marcin Jan Redowicz, MA, Anna Korecka-Polak, PhD, Agata Miszczak-Kaczorowska, MA, Elzbieta Kuriata, Sr., PhD, Ewa Walejewska, PhD, Kamila Gala, PhD, Mira Ludwikowska, MA, Magdalena Rdzanek, Sr., PhD.
AOTMiT - Agency for Health Technology Assessment & Tariff System, Warsaw, Poland.
OBJECTIVES: This analysis aimed to evaluate the alignment between the 2026 update of the Polish HTA guidelines and methodological documents developed under the EU HTA framework, and to assess the implications for the use of Joint Clinical Assessment (JCA) reports in national reimbursement processes.
METHODS: A comparative analysis was conducted between the updated Polish HTA guidelines in scoping and clinical analysis and EU HTA methodological guidance, dossier templates, and Commission Implementing Regulations. Similarities and differences were identified and assessed regarding their potential impact on the applicability of JCA within the Polish HTA process.
RESULTS: The updated Polish guidelines incorporate a few concepts reflected in EU HTA guidance in terms of outcomes and comparators. They also refer to EU methodological recommendations on indirect treatment comparisons, meta-analyses, and reporting of multiplicity issues. Nevertheless, a few methodological differences were identified, such as discrepancies in literature search requirements, with Polish guidelines specifying three core bibliographic databases compared to a minimum of two in EU guidance. Unlike JCA requirements, the Polish guidelines allow clinical effectiveness assessments based on single-arm studies when indirect comparisons are not feasible and require descriptive analyses when quantitative synthesis cannot be performed. Furthermore, they require presentation of relevant systematic reviews, allow broader inclusion of evidence for safety assessment, and do not explicitly permit exclusion of lower-certainty evidence when higher-quality studies sufficiently address the research question.
CONCLUSIONS: Although increasing methodological convergence between Polish and EU HTA requirements can be observed, significant differences persist, which may limit the direct use of JCA reports in national reimbursement assessments and necessitate supplementary analyses. While Polish reimbursement legislation allows JCA reports to replace the national clinical assessments, practical experience gained during HTAR implementation will be essential to determine the extent to which JCA can support decision-making in Poland.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2026-11, ISPOR Europe 2026, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Volume 29, Issue 12S

Code

HTA290

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory, Health Technology Assessment, Methodological & Statistical Research

Topic Subcategory

Decision & Deliberative Processes, Systems & Structure

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×