A CROSS-UK EXPLORATION OF STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT APPROACHES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT AND GUIDELINE METHODS AND PROCESSES

Author(s)

Jean Ryan, MLIS1, Nichole Taske, PhD2.
1Health Economics and Decision Modelling Team, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, United Kingdom, 2NICE, London, United Kingdom.
OBJECTIVES: Under the 2024 Voluntary Scheme for Branded Medicines Pricing, Access and Growth (VPAG), a GBP 400 million Investment Programme commits to strengthening HTA methods and processes across the UK. NICE, the Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC), the All Wales Therapeutics and Toxicology Centre (AWTTC), and the Northern Ireland Department of Health (NIDH) are working to improve assessment efficiency, accelerate adoption of recommendations, and prepare for increased volumes of new medicines. Effective and transparent stakeholder engagement is critical to this work. This study explores stakeholder engagement approaches used by organisations involved in HTA, guideline development and national implementation of evidence-based healthcare across the UK, identifying areas of alignment, variation and opportunities for shared learning.
METHODS: A survey of colleagues from NICE, SMC, AWTTC and NIDH was conducted to explore current approaches to stakeholder engagement across organisations involved in HTA, guideline development and national implementation of evidence-based healthcare throughout the UK. This work was informed by the NHSE and NHS improvement stakeholder analysis framework (2023) and stakeholder theory, including power-interest approaches. Follow-up interviews will supplement survey findings.
RESULTS: Early findings suggest more similarities than differences across organisations. Respondents described stakeholder engagement as helping to identify risks and unintended consequences, maintain legitimacy and trust, ensuring acceptability. Similar stakeholder groups were engaged, including patients, clinicians, methodological experts and policy stakeholders. Differences were mainly seen in the formality of engagement approaches, governance arrangements and how stakeholder influence is communicated. Common challenges included balancing stakeholder input with technical requirements, identifying appropriate stakeholders and resource constraints. Examples of good practice included structured patient involvement, engagement throughout development and formal governance arrangements.
CONCLUSIONS: Stakeholder engagement is a valued part of methods and process development across UK HTA organisations. While approaches differ, the findings highlight opportunities to share learning and support more consistent and transparent engagement across the UK system.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2026-11, ISPOR Europe 2026, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Volume 29, Issue 12S

Code

OP10

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory, Health Technology Assessment, Organizational Practices

Topic Subcategory

Best Research Practices

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×