VIGNETTE-DERIVED HEALTH STATE UTILITIES IN SCANDINAVIAN HTA ASSESSMENTS
Author(s)
Luca Bottazzi, MSc, Alva Mickelsson, MSc, Peter Carlqvist, BSc, MSc, PhD, Kajsa Stina Olsson, BA, MSc.
Nordic Market Access NMA AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
Nordic Market Access NMA AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the assessment of health state utilities derived from vignette studies by Swedish, Danish, and Norwegian health technology assessment (HTA) agencies in economic analyses.
METHODS: A key word search was conducted in the NMAi database, which includes documents from Nordic HTA-bodies, to identify reimbursement assessment reports issued by TLV, DMC, and NoMA between 2016 and 2025. Search hits were assessed for the use of vignette-derived health state utilities. Metadata on drug name, indication, reimbursement or funding status, and other relevant variables were collected and analysed using descriptive statistics.
RESULTS: The search resulted in 73 documents. A total of 41 assessments of 29 drugs contained vignette-derived utilities (n=13, TLV; n=18, DMC; n=10, NoMA). Slightly more than half of the drugs assessed were classified as orphan drugs by the European Medicines Agency (EMA).Vignette-derived utilities were used in the authorities’ base cases in 58% of DMC assessments, 60% of NoMA assessments, and 38% of TLV assessments. The main reason for the authorities to not use the vignette-derived utilities were the availability of alternatives, such as trial-based utilities.
CONCLUSIONS: Vignette-derived health state utilities have been used for decision-making in Scandinavia, however, authorities view them as uncertain and prefer more conventional collections, such as trial-based utilities. The majority of the assessed drugs that included vignette-derived utilities were orphan drugs. This likely reflects the challenges of collecting patient-reported utility data in rare diseases, where small patient populations, disease severity, and logistical constraints often limit the feasibility of generating robust trial-based utility estimates.
METHODS: A key word search was conducted in the NMAi database, which includes documents from Nordic HTA-bodies, to identify reimbursement assessment reports issued by TLV, DMC, and NoMA between 2016 and 2025. Search hits were assessed for the use of vignette-derived health state utilities. Metadata on drug name, indication, reimbursement or funding status, and other relevant variables were collected and analysed using descriptive statistics.
RESULTS: The search resulted in 73 documents. A total of 41 assessments of 29 drugs contained vignette-derived utilities (n=13, TLV; n=18, DMC; n=10, NoMA). Slightly more than half of the drugs assessed were classified as orphan drugs by the European Medicines Agency (EMA).Vignette-derived utilities were used in the authorities’ base cases in 58% of DMC assessments, 60% of NoMA assessments, and 38% of TLV assessments. The main reason for the authorities to not use the vignette-derived utilities were the availability of alternatives, such as trial-based utilities.
CONCLUSIONS: Vignette-derived health state utilities have been used for decision-making in Scandinavia, however, authorities view them as uncertain and prefer more conventional collections, such as trial-based utilities. The majority of the assessed drugs that included vignette-derived utilities were orphan drugs. This likely reflects the challenges of collecting patient-reported utility data in rare diseases, where small patient populations, disease severity, and logistical constraints often limit the feasibility of generating robust trial-based utility estimates.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2026-11, ISPOR Europe 2026, Vienna, Austria
Value in Health, Volume 29, Issue 12S
Code
HTA228
Topic
Economic Evaluation, Health Technology Assessment
Topic Subcategory
Decision & Deliberative Processes
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas