UNDERSTANDING HOW TO MEASURE WHOLE HEALTH: AN EXPLORATIVE STUDY TO IDENTIFY WHOLE HEALTH TOOLS FOR OUTCOMES RESEARCH

Author(s)

Tilly Stott, MPH, Laure-Lou Perrier, MSc, Nadine Gabriele Kraft, MSc.
Mapi Research Trust, Lyon, France.
OBJECTIVES: Whole Health is an emerging term that integrates longstanding health outcome concepts namely physical, social, and psychological functioning, along with signs and symptoms. Beyond these concepts, Whole Health also incorporates environmental, spiritual, and economic influences on health. Consistent with ISPOR’s 2030 Strategy, which includes Whole Health, this study aimed to identify how to measure Whole Health and which tools currently capture its sub-concepts.
METHODS: ISPOR’s Whole Health literature was used to establish a conceptual framework. Next, keyword searches were performed in PROQOLID’s “Domain” field, a clinical outcome assessment (COA) library, to identify instruments measuring at least two Whole Health sub-concepts. Considering the conventional conceptual scope of COAs, our search focused specifically on environmental, spiritual, and economic domains. Gap analysis then evaluated whether any COAs comprehensively measured Whole Health. Due to limited COAs measuring environmental factors, a supplemental search was conducted in Atlas, a digital health technology (DHT) repository, by reviewing DHTs listed within the “Environment” category of “Measures”.
RESULTS: After de-duplication, 129 COAs were identified with ten addressing all Whole Health components. Three targeted the general population (SigQOLM, SigQOLM-36, WHOQOL-100), four focused on mental health (CAN-M, Mayers’ LSQ (2), QLS-BC, QOL.BD), two on older adults (Mayers’ LSQ (3), OPQOL), and one on caregivers of people with terminal illnesses (QOLLTI-F). 290 DHTs covering 25 relevant environmental sub-concepts were identified in Atlas. Frequently used DHTs were Besi-C (n=7), ADXL362A (n=7), and Awair Omni (n=6). Common therapeutic indications included, diabetes (n=12), general population (n=12), and Parkinson’s disease (n=9).
CONCLUSIONS: Several COAs measure components of Whole Health, yet widespread applicability is limited by population specificity and respondent burden given the often-high number of items. Environmental measurement is underrepresented in COAs; however, we found numerous DHTs. Future research may consider integrating DHTs measuring environmental factors alongside COAs to support more comprehensive, holistic, and less burdensome Whole Health assessment.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2026-11, ISPOR Europe 2026, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Volume 29, Issue 12S

Code

PT22

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Medical Technologies, Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Instrument Development, Validation, & Translation

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×