A SCENARIO-BASED SIMULATION FRAMEWORK TO BRIDGE EFFICACY TO REAL-WORLD EFFECTIVENESS FOR NEWLY APPROVED THERAPIES
Author(s)
Pauline Guilmin, MSc, Paul Loustalot, MSc, Ghinwa Hayek, MPH, MSc, Nina Temam, PharmD, Billy Amzal, MBA, MPH, MSc, PhD.
Quinten Health, Paris, France.
Quinten Health, Paris, France.
OBJECTIVES: Efficacy to effectiveness bridging can provide early insights on long-term outcomes, supporting evidence generationfor newly approved therapies. We propose a simulation framework to project long-term treatment effects in real-world (RW) settings under different scenarios. It was applied to estimate the effectiveness of adding zilucoplan to standard of care (SoC) on severe exacerbations in generalized myasthenia gravis.
METHODS: A two-step simulation framework was developed to estimate effectiveness under specified RW scenarios. First, a Cox proportional hazards disease-progression model is trained and validated to estimate baseline event-free survival under SoC. Second, individual survival curves are simulated in scenario-specific populations under SoC alone and the investigational treatment by combining the disease-progression model with a treatment-effect model derived from trials. Uncertainty is quantified by sampling the treatment-effect coefficient across repeated simulations. Results are summarized as scenario-specific mean event-free survival curves with 95% confidence intervals and associated risk reductions at a prespecified time point. In our application, zilucoplan added to SoC was the investigational treatment, with two-year effectiveness assessed across scenarios reflecting different SoC therapy profiles. Its treatment effect was estimated from clinical trial data; while scenario populations were informed by MarketScan claims data.
RESULTS: In our application, the disease-progression model showed acceptable predictive performance (C-index: 0.71; mean time-dependent AUC: 0.73; integrated Brier score: 0.08). Across SoC-based scenarios, the framework simulated lower risks of severe exacerbation over two years when adding zilucoplan to SoC vs SoC alone, although confidence intervals overlapped. Two-year risk reductions ranged from 8.6% to 15.1% across SoC-based scenarios with heterogeneous baseline predicted risks.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the value of RW simulation-based approaches for anticipating long-term outcomes when evidence is limited. By combining predictive modelling with trial efficacy and uncertainty estimation this framework can support early evidence generation and characterize long-term outcome variation across clinically relevant scenarios.
METHODS: A two-step simulation framework was developed to estimate effectiveness under specified RW scenarios. First, a Cox proportional hazards disease-progression model is trained and validated to estimate baseline event-free survival under SoC. Second, individual survival curves are simulated in scenario-specific populations under SoC alone and the investigational treatment by combining the disease-progression model with a treatment-effect model derived from trials. Uncertainty is quantified by sampling the treatment-effect coefficient across repeated simulations. Results are summarized as scenario-specific mean event-free survival curves with 95% confidence intervals and associated risk reductions at a prespecified time point. In our application, zilucoplan added to SoC was the investigational treatment, with two-year effectiveness assessed across scenarios reflecting different SoC therapy profiles. Its treatment effect was estimated from clinical trial data; while scenario populations were informed by MarketScan claims data.
RESULTS: In our application, the disease-progression model showed acceptable predictive performance (C-index: 0.71; mean time-dependent AUC: 0.73; integrated Brier score: 0.08). Across SoC-based scenarios, the framework simulated lower risks of severe exacerbation over two years when adding zilucoplan to SoC vs SoC alone, although confidence intervals overlapped. Two-year risk reductions ranged from 8.6% to 15.1% across SoC-based scenarios with heterogeneous baseline predicted risks.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the value of RW simulation-based approaches for anticipating long-term outcomes when evidence is limited. By combining predictive modelling with trial efficacy and uncertainty estimation this framework can support early evidence generation and characterize long-term outcome variation across clinically relevant scenarios.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2026-11, ISPOR Europe 2026, Vienna, Austria
Value in Health, Volume 29, Issue 12S
Code
MSR175
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Methodological & Statistical Research, Study Approaches
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas