WHAT WOULD IT TAKE TO BEAT PERTUZUMAB? A COST-EFFECTIVENESS THRESHOLD ANALYSIS IN HER2-POSITIVE METASTATIC BREAST CANCER
Author(s)
Raymond H. Henderson, MSc, PhD, Jay Bilimoria, PhD, Holly Gould, MSc, Heritage Kristilere, MPH, MD, Tahera Patel, MSc, Hannah Rice, BSc, Michal Witkowski, MSc, Alison Martin, MSc, MD.
Crystallise Ltd, Colchester, United Kingdom.
Crystallise Ltd, Colchester, United Kingdom.
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the efficacy and pricing requirements for a hypothetical HER2-targeted therapy ("Drug X") to achieve cost-effectiveness relative to pertuzumab, trastuzumab and docetaxel (PTD) in first-line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC) from an NHS England perspective.
METHODS: A partitioned survival model was developed to compare PTD with trastuzumab plus docetaxel (TD) over a lifetime horizon. Health states included progression-free disease, progressed disease and death. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3.5% annually. Clinical efficacy was informed by published trial data and extrapolated using parametric survival models. A threshold analysis was subsequently undertaken in which Drug X was compared against PTD. Drug X acquisition cost (£1,000-£4,000 per cycle) and treatment effect (overall survival [OS] and progression-free survival [PFS] hazard ratios [HRs] between 0.40 and 1.00) were varied to identify combinations capable of achieving more favourable cost-effectiveness than PTD.
RESULTS: In the base case, PTD generated 3.09 discounted quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) compared with 2.36 QALYs for TD, providing an incremental gain of 0.73 QALYs. Incremental costs were £128,145, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £175,474/QALY. Following application of a 42% patient access scheme discount, the pertuzumab ICER decreased to £59,101/QALY (£34,765/QALY when applying a severity modifier). Threshold analyses demonstrated that Drug X could achieve substantially lower ICERs than PTD across a broad range of price-efficacy combinations. At a treatment cost equivalent to pertuzumab list price (£2,395 per cycle) and HRs of 0.75 for both OS and PFS, Drug X generated an ICER of £1,421/QALY versus PTD. Greater survival benefits expanded the range of prices at which Drug X remained attractive.
CONCLUSIONS: Threshold analyses provide a framework for quantifying the clinical benefit and pricing required for novel therapies to compete with established standards of care. In HER2-positive mBC, survival gains can offset higher acquisition costs and support favourable cost-effectiveness relative to PTD.
METHODS: A partitioned survival model was developed to compare PTD with trastuzumab plus docetaxel (TD) over a lifetime horizon. Health states included progression-free disease, progressed disease and death. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3.5% annually. Clinical efficacy was informed by published trial data and extrapolated using parametric survival models. A threshold analysis was subsequently undertaken in which Drug X was compared against PTD. Drug X acquisition cost (£1,000-£4,000 per cycle) and treatment effect (overall survival [OS] and progression-free survival [PFS] hazard ratios [HRs] between 0.40 and 1.00) were varied to identify combinations capable of achieving more favourable cost-effectiveness than PTD.
RESULTS: In the base case, PTD generated 3.09 discounted quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) compared with 2.36 QALYs for TD, providing an incremental gain of 0.73 QALYs. Incremental costs were £128,145, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £175,474/QALY. Following application of a 42% patient access scheme discount, the pertuzumab ICER decreased to £59,101/QALY (£34,765/QALY when applying a severity modifier). Threshold analyses demonstrated that Drug X could achieve substantially lower ICERs than PTD across a broad range of price-efficacy combinations. At a treatment cost equivalent to pertuzumab list price (£2,395 per cycle) and HRs of 0.75 for both OS and PFS, Drug X generated an ICER of £1,421/QALY versus PTD. Greater survival benefits expanded the range of prices at which Drug X remained attractive.
CONCLUSIONS: Threshold analyses provide a framework for quantifying the clinical benefit and pricing required for novel therapies to compete with established standards of care. In HER2-positive mBC, survival gains can offset higher acquisition costs and support favourable cost-effectiveness relative to PTD.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2026-11, ISPOR Europe 2026, Vienna, Austria
Value in Health, Volume 29, Issue 12S
Code
EE235
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation, Health Technology Assessment
Disease
Oncology, Personalized & Precision Medicine