SELECTING AND CO-DEVELOPING A DISEASE-SPECIFIC REFERENCE CASE EXTENSION FOR ADVANCED CANCER TO SUPPORT CONSISTENT HEALTH ECONOMIC MODELING ACROSS THE GUIDANCE LIFECYCLE
Author(s)
Lindsay Claxton, MMath, David Wonderling, MSc, Sophia Kemmis Betty, MSc, Nichole Taske, PhD.
NICE, London, United Kingdom.
NICE, London, United Kingdom.
OBJECTIVES: NICE is transitioning to a whole lifecycle approach to guidance development and maintenance, requiring more consistent, robust and efficient health economic methods across disease areas. This study aimed to develop and apply a transparent selection framework for disease-specific reference case extensions, and to assess advanced cancer as a potential topic for development.
METHODS: A two-stage selection framework was developed with input from NICE teams responsible for health economics, decision modelling, surveillance and prioritisation. Stage 1 assessed candidate areas against operational concepts for whole lifecycle guidance, including alignment with system-wide priorities, impact on patient outcomes, budgetary impact and need to bring together NICE guidance. Stage 2 assessed the expected added value of a reference case extension for health economic modelling and committee decision-making, considering current modelling challenges, future innovation pipelines, and operational feasibility.
RESULTS: Thirteen cancer topics met key operational criteria, including alignment with national cancer priorities, high drug expenditure and challenges incorporating technology appraisal recommendations into guidelines. Advanced cancer was identified as a strong candidate for a disease-specific reference case extension because no single validated, usable health economic model exists across the area and existing submissions show recurring methodological inconsistencies, particularly around structural uncertainty and resource-use estimation. The topic also has continuing relevance because of a sustained pipeline of innovative therapies and biosimilar opportunities with potential implications for value-based decision-making and guidance updates.
CONCLUSIONS: A structured, transparent framework can support selection of disease-specific reference case extensions under a whole lifecycle approach. Applying the framework supported advanced cancer as a high-priority topic where consistent modelling guidance could improve efficiency, methodological consistency and the maintainability of NICE guidance.
METHODS: A two-stage selection framework was developed with input from NICE teams responsible for health economics, decision modelling, surveillance and prioritisation. Stage 1 assessed candidate areas against operational concepts for whole lifecycle guidance, including alignment with system-wide priorities, impact on patient outcomes, budgetary impact and need to bring together NICE guidance. Stage 2 assessed the expected added value of a reference case extension for health economic modelling and committee decision-making, considering current modelling challenges, future innovation pipelines, and operational feasibility.
RESULTS: Thirteen cancer topics met key operational criteria, including alignment with national cancer priorities, high drug expenditure and challenges incorporating technology appraisal recommendations into guidelines. Advanced cancer was identified as a strong candidate for a disease-specific reference case extension because no single validated, usable health economic model exists across the area and existing submissions show recurring methodological inconsistencies, particularly around structural uncertainty and resource-use estimation. The topic also has continuing relevance because of a sustained pipeline of innovative therapies and biosimilar opportunities with potential implications for value-based decision-making and guidance updates.
CONCLUSIONS: A structured, transparent framework can support selection of disease-specific reference case extensions under a whole lifecycle approach. Applying the framework supported advanced cancer as a high-priority topic where consistent modelling guidance could improve efficiency, methodological consistency and the maintainability of NICE guidance.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2026-11, ISPOR Europe 2026, Vienna, Austria
Value in Health, Volume 29, Issue 12S
Code
HTA144
Topic
Economic Evaluation, Health Technology Assessment, Organizational Practices
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas