IMPACT OF MEDICARE PRICE NEGOTIATION ON COMPARATIVE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF IBRUTINIB, ACALABRUTINIB, AND ZANUBRUTINIB IN CHRONIC LYMPHOCYTIC LEUKEMIA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND NETWORK META-ANALYSIS
Author(s)
ANTO AMITH BIJU J, Masters in International Health Economics1, Sruthi Neelakantam, Masters in International Health Economics1, Aina M Shaju, Master in Public Health2, Abhishek Nair, MSc1.
1International Health and Pharmacoeconomics, Hochschule Fresenius University of Applied Sciences, Wiesbaden, Germany, 2Independent Researcher, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
1International Health and Pharmacoeconomics, Hochschule Fresenius University of Applied Sciences, Wiesbaden, Germany, 2Independent Researcher, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
OBJECTIVES: Ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, and zanubrutinib are indicated as monotherapy for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). Comparative cost-effectiveness analyses have historically favoured second-generation BTK inhibitors (BTKis) over ibrutinib, owing to ibrutinib's inferior safety profile (atrial fibrillation: 16-17% vs 7-9% for acalabrutinib/zanubrutinib). In January 2026, ibrutinib became the first oncology drug subject to Medicare price negotiation under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), reducing its price from $14,934 to $9,319 per 28-day supply (38% reduction). We present a conceptual framework for a PROSPERO-registered systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA; PROSPERO CRD420261419098) to quantify whether IRA-negotiated pricing alters the comparative BTKi cost-effectiveness in CLL.
METHODS: A systematic review will search MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov from database inception to July 2026 for published economic evaluations of ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, and zanubrutinib in CLL, following PRISMA and CHEERS 2022 guidance. A de novo partitioned survival model will integrate NMA-derived progression-free survival hazard ratios across four pricing scenarios (wholesale acquisition cost, Medicare negotiated price, projected future negotiation, generic entry) with adverse-event cost offsets, stratified by del(17p)/TP53 mutation status. Bayesian NMA methods will be applied.
RESULTS: Systematic scoping identified 13 published economic evaluations (2018 to 2026); none incorporated IRA-negotiated pricing. Historical ICERs were highly heterogeneous across healthcare systems: ibrutinib vs chemoimmunotherapy, $189,000/QALY (US); acalabrutinib vs ibrutinib, £61,941/QALY (UK NHS). At ibrutinib's negotiated price of $9,319/month, the gap relative to standard US willingness-to-pay thresholds of $100,000 to $150,000/QALY narrows but remains unresolved. Adverse-event cost offsets remain unquantified across all identified studies.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite a 38% price reduction, ibrutinib's cost-effectiveness relative to second-generation BTKis remains context-dependent and unresolved. This NMA-based synthesis, the first to incorporate IRA pricing, adverse-event offsets, and biomarker stratification, will inform BTKi formulary decisions for US payers, NICE, and international HTA bodies. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
METHODS: A systematic review will search MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov from database inception to July 2026 for published economic evaluations of ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, and zanubrutinib in CLL, following PRISMA and CHEERS 2022 guidance. A de novo partitioned survival model will integrate NMA-derived progression-free survival hazard ratios across four pricing scenarios (wholesale acquisition cost, Medicare negotiated price, projected future negotiation, generic entry) with adverse-event cost offsets, stratified by del(17p)/TP53 mutation status. Bayesian NMA methods will be applied.
RESULTS: Systematic scoping identified 13 published economic evaluations (2018 to 2026); none incorporated IRA-negotiated pricing. Historical ICERs were highly heterogeneous across healthcare systems: ibrutinib vs chemoimmunotherapy, $189,000/QALY (US); acalabrutinib vs ibrutinib, £61,941/QALY (UK NHS). At ibrutinib's negotiated price of $9,319/month, the gap relative to standard US willingness-to-pay thresholds of $100,000 to $150,000/QALY narrows but remains unresolved. Adverse-event cost offsets remain unquantified across all identified studies.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite a 38% price reduction, ibrutinib's cost-effectiveness relative to second-generation BTKis remains context-dependent and unresolved. This NMA-based synthesis, the first to incorporate IRA pricing, adverse-event offsets, and biomarker stratification, will inform BTKi formulary decisions for US payers, NICE, and international HTA bodies. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2026-11, ISPOR Europe 2026, Vienna, Austria
Value in Health, Volume 29, Issue 12S
Code
EE211
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation, Health Technology Assessment
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Oncology