THE HIDDEN COSTS OF CONFIDENTIAL REBATES : A MULTI-LEVEL RISK ANALYSIS OF THE FRENCH 'OUT-OF-DRG' HOSPITAL FINANCING SYSTEM
Author(s)
ines palmieri, PharmD candidate, Marion TANO, PhD, OLIVIER PARENT DE CURZON, PharmD, PASCAL PAUBEL, PhD, ALBANE DEGRASSAT THEAS, PhD.
AGEPS - APHP, Paris, France.
AGEPS - APHP, Paris, France.
OBJECTIVES: In France, innovative hospital therapies rely on exceptional add-on funding outside the standard DRG framework (innovative and high-cost drugs included in the 'liste en sus', and early access). While the Economic Committee for Health Products (CEPS) uses confidential rebates as a central regulatory lever, the growing gap between public list prices (PFHT) and actual net prices—reaching €3.9bn in 2024 for out-of-DRG drugs—creates multiple downstream inefficiencies. To assess both the efficiency and limitations of this regulatory mechanism by modelling the microeconomic (hospitals), macroeconomic (national health budget known as “ONDAM”), and international vulnerabilities induced by this expanding price differential.
METHODS: Focusing on the French hospital market, this study combines financial flow mapping with a Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) framework applied to every transactional touchpoint within the out-of-DRG reimbursement circuit.
RESULTS: At hospital level, three major critical failure modes were identified:
CONCLUSIONS: While confidential rebates effectively secure immediate patient access to innovation at a contained macroeconomic cost, they nevertheless shift the financial risks to hospitals. Optimizing financial compensation circuits is imperative to preserve the sustainability of this regulatory model.
METHODS: Focusing on the French hospital market, this study combines financial flow mapping with a Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) framework applied to every transactional touchpoint within the out-of-DRG reimbursement circuit.
RESULTS: At hospital level, three major critical failure modes were identified:
- A transitional cash-flow burdens on hospitals fronting procurement costs at PFHT;
- Drastic reduction in hospital bargaining space for innovative drugs;
- Heightened risk of inventory devaluation when the CEPS converts rebates into list-price reductions.
CONCLUSIONS: While confidential rebates effectively secure immediate patient access to innovation at a contained macroeconomic cost, they nevertheless shift the financial risks to hospitals. Optimizing financial compensation circuits is imperative to preserve the sustainability of this regulatory model.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2026-11, ISPOR Europe 2026, Vienna, Austria
Value in Health, Volume 29, Issue 12S
Code
HPR36
Topic
Health Policy & Regulatory
Topic Subcategory
Pricing Policy & Schemes, Public Spending & National Health Expenditures
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas