A LOCAL-FIRST, PRIVACY-PRESERVING PLATFORM INTEGRATING THE FULL SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS PIPELINE WITH ON-DEVICE AI

Author(s)

Vitor P. Daldegan1, Lício A. Velloso, MD, PhD2.
1State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil, 2University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
OBJECTIVES: Systematic reviews (SR) and meta-analyses underpin health technology assessment (HTA), coverage, and reimbursement decisions, yet the workflow remains fragmented across single-purpose tools, and cloud-hosted AI raises data-governance and confidentiality concerns when evidence is sensitive or proprietary. We aimed to design and build an integrated, local-first platform covering the entire SR-to-publication pipeline, in which AI assistance runs entirely on the user’s machine and all methodological computation is deterministic and auditable.
METHODS: Compendium implements an 11-stage pipeline—dashboard, protocol, eligibility, search, import/deduplication, screening, full-text review, extraction, risk of bias, synthesis, and reporting—as a cross-platform Tauri/Rust desktop application with an embedded SQLite store, AI-assisted decisions via a provider-agnostic LLM layer, and automated PRISMA flow-diagram generation. Study data reside locally in SQLite; account metadata is cloud-stored. AI is local-first (Ollama/llama.cpp), with a human-in-the-loop trust boundary; research data stay on-device.
RESULTS: A complete 11-stage pipeline is implemented and packaged as a native Windows build (.exe, MSI, NSIS), with every stage navigable via a persistent workflow rail and command palette. Risk of bias uses three official instruments: a deterministic RoB 2 calculator (Sterne 2019), ROBINS-I v1, and ROBINS-E. Meta-analysis computes RR/OR/MD/SMD with DerSimonian-Laird random effects, heterogeneity (I², τ², Q, χ²), leave-one-out, and subgroup analysis; JAMA-style forest, funnel, and PRISMA 2020 flow diagrams export to SVG. Dual independent screening with Cohen’s κ (human-human and AI-human) and consensus resolution. No user-outcome or accuracy data are claimed — results describe implemented architecture and instruments, not clinical validation.
CONCLUSIONS: An integrated, local-first SR/meta-analysis platform is technically feasible without sending research data to external servers, combining official risk-of-bias instruments, standard meta-analytic methods, and a verifiable human-in-the-loop AI boundary in a single auditable workflow — designed to address confidentiality constraints common in health economics and outcomes research (HEOR)/HTA. A prospective validation cohort comparing platform-assisted and conventional review is the planned next step.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2026-11, ISPOR Europe 2026, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Volume 29, Issue 12S

Code

SA22

Topic

Medical Technologies, Methodological & Statistical Research, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Literature Review & Synthesis, Meta-Analysis & Indirect Comparisons

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×