USER PREFERENCES FOR HEALTH APPLICATIONS: POPULATION-REPRESENTATIVE CONJOINT EXPERIMENTS IN AUSTRIA AND ITALY

Author(s)

Nguyen L. Truong, MSc, Erika Mosor, PhD, Valentin Ritschl, PhD, Tanja Stamm, PhD.
Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
OBJECTIVES: Although digital health applications have considerable potential to support disease management and promote well-being, adoption rates remain relatively low. In order to support design, implementation, and dissemination of health applications, this study aimed to identify factors influencing individuals' preferences for using them.
METHODS: We conducted a survey with an embedded conjoint experiment among population-representative samples of 3444 Austrians and 2994 Italians in second half of 2025. We tested attributes such as who recommended the App, content, functionality, developer, data usage and cost. Average marginal component effects (AMCE) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were calculated.
RESULTS: In both Austria and Italy, participants strongly preferred health applications recommended by a healthcare professional rather than a friend (Austria: AMCE=0.466, 95% CI 0.334-0.598; Italy: AMCE=0.423, 95% CI 0.291-0.555), whereas AI-generated recommendations reduced preferences (Austria: AMCE=-0.310, 95% CI -0.441 to -0.179; Italy: AMCE=-0.181, 95% CI -0.313 to -0.049). Compared with peer-to-peer chat functions, Austrian participants preferred applications that enabled booking appointments with healthcare professionals (AMCE=0.321, 95% CI 0.188-0.455) and asking health-related questions (AMCE=0.268, 95% CI 0.137-0.399), while in Italy only appointment booking increased preferences (AMCE=0.169, 95% CI 0.042-0.297). Applications developed by university hospitals were preferred over national and international companies in Austria (AMCE=0.213, 95% CI 0.096-0.330), but not in Italy. Compared with personal data use only, Austrian participants were less likely to prefer applications that used their data to train AI models (AMCE=-0.153, 95% CI -0.282 to -0.023), whereas no such effect was observed in Italy. In both countries, applications covered by health insurance were preferred over self-funded applications.
CONCLUSIONS: Preferences for health applications were primarily driven by trust-related factors, including recommendations from healthcare professionals, health insurance coverage, and, in Austria, development by a university hospital.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2026-11, ISPOR Europe 2026, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Volume 29, Issue 12S

Code

P32

Topic

Epidemiology & Public Health, Medical Technologies, Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Patient Behavior and Incentives

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×