REAL-WORLD TREATMENT PATTERNS AMONG PATIENTS WITH EGFR-POSITIVE METASTATIC NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER
Author(s)
Rohan Vashi, PharmD, MS, David Iwanyckyj, BA, Fernando Otalora, MS, Melanie Jardim, PhD.
Amplity, Inc., Langhorne, PA, USA.
Amplity, Inc., Langhorne, PA, USA.
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) often utilizes targeted therapy or chemotherapy, dependent on molecular profiling. Optimal sequencing remains unclear among patients with EGFR-mutated mNSCLC, posing challenges in clinical decision-making. This study characterizes real-world treatment patterns among community and academic physicians and identifies reasons for treatment transitions, particularly among an EGFR-positive patient subgroup.
METHODS: A proprietary AI and natural language processing platform searched, analyzed, and reviewed the Amplity AnswerY™ real-world database composed of HIPAA-compliant, US-based transcribed physician notes. Patients who had mentioned diagnosis of mNSCLC and EGFR-positive disease from 2020-2025 were included and followed from first-line (1L) through third-line (3L) treatments. Trends in prescribing habits and switching reasons were documented between lines of therapy.
RESULTS: AnswerY identified 17,587 patients with mNSCLC, of which 927 patients were EGFR-positive. The mean age of both cohorts was approximately 68 years and most were White (87.1%/83.9%). In both cohorts, chemotherapy alone and a chemotherapy/immunotherapy combination were the most common 1L choices (42.2%/27.4%). The most common 1L-3L treatment sequence among patients reaching each line was chemotherapy alone/immunotherapy alone/other therapies (42.2%/34.8%/40.1%). Among the EGFR-positive subgroup, the most common 1L-3L treatment sequence was an EGFR-targeted therapy other than osimertinib/osimertinib/other therapies (30.0%/29.1%/32.8%). In the EGFR-positive subgroup, approximately 39.7% of patients did not receive an EGFR-targeted therapy in 1L. Among all patients with mNSCLC and EGFR-positive disease, 1L-2L switching reasons included disease progression (41.2%/30.9%), adverse events (7.3%/9.3%), and planned transition (9.3%/2.0%).
CONCLUSIONS: AnswerY identified that among all patients with mNSCLC, chemotherapy is the most common 1L treatment option. However, among the EGFR-positive subgroup a significant proportion of patients did not receive EGFR-targeted 1L treatment, despite being recommended by current treatment guidelines. These data illustrate a need for increased provider education on guideline-directed care in patients with EGFR-positive mNSCLC and continued investigations into understanding barriers to real-world protocol adherence.
METHODS: A proprietary AI and natural language processing platform searched, analyzed, and reviewed the Amplity AnswerY™ real-world database composed of HIPAA-compliant, US-based transcribed physician notes. Patients who had mentioned diagnosis of mNSCLC and EGFR-positive disease from 2020-2025 were included and followed from first-line (1L) through third-line (3L) treatments. Trends in prescribing habits and switching reasons were documented between lines of therapy.
RESULTS: AnswerY identified 17,587 patients with mNSCLC, of which 927 patients were EGFR-positive. The mean age of both cohorts was approximately 68 years and most were White (87.1%/83.9%). In both cohorts, chemotherapy alone and a chemotherapy/immunotherapy combination were the most common 1L choices (42.2%/27.4%). The most common 1L-3L treatment sequence among patients reaching each line was chemotherapy alone/immunotherapy alone/other therapies (42.2%/34.8%/40.1%). Among the EGFR-positive subgroup, the most common 1L-3L treatment sequence was an EGFR-targeted therapy other than osimertinib/osimertinib/other therapies (30.0%/29.1%/32.8%). In the EGFR-positive subgroup, approximately 39.7% of patients did not receive an EGFR-targeted therapy in 1L. Among all patients with mNSCLC and EGFR-positive disease, 1L-2L switching reasons included disease progression (41.2%/30.9%), adverse events (7.3%/9.3%), and planned transition (9.3%/2.0%).
CONCLUSIONS: AnswerY identified that among all patients with mNSCLC, chemotherapy is the most common 1L treatment option. However, among the EGFR-positive subgroup a significant proportion of patients did not receive EGFR-targeted 1L treatment, despite being recommended by current treatment guidelines. These data illustrate a need for increased provider education on guideline-directed care in patients with EGFR-positive mNSCLC and continued investigations into understanding barriers to real-world protocol adherence.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2026-05, ISPOR 2026, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Value in Health, Volume 29, Issue S6
Code
RWD89
Topic
Real World Data & Information Systems
Topic Subcategory
Health & Insurance Records Systems
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, SDC: Oncology