SEQUENTIAL TREATMENT PATTERNS IN METASTATIC TRIPLE-NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER (MTNBC) USING JAPANESE CLAIMS DATA
Author(s)
Mao Yamaguchi, MS1, Zhonghua CHEN2, Yoshinori Maki3, Kensuke Moriwaki, BS, MS, PhD4.
1Student, Ritsumeikan university, Kusatsu, Japan, 2Kusatsu, Japan, 3Ritsumeikan Univ, Kusatsu, Japan, 4Ritsumeikan University, Kyoto, Japan.
1Student, Ritsumeikan university, Kusatsu, Japan, 2Kusatsu, Japan, 3Ritsumeikan Univ, Kusatsu, Japan, 4Ritsumeikan University, Kyoto, Japan.
OBJECTIVES: To analyze sequential treatment patterns in patients with TNBC and visualize transitions across treatment lines using a large Japanese claims database.
METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted using the JMDC claims database in Japan. TNBC patients were identified using a proxy definition based on the use of TNBC-related anticancer agents and the absence of hormone receptor-targeted and HER2-targeted therapies. Metastatic patients were identified using ICD-10 codes (C77-C80). Drugs administered within the same month were treated as combination regimens, and first-, second-, and third-line therapies were constructed at the patient level. Treatment frequencies and transitions between treatment lines were summarized descriptively and visualized using Sankey diagrams.
RESULTS: In first-line treatment, epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (19.7%) and doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (16.4%) were the most frequently observed regimens. In second-line treatment, paclitaxel (29.9%) and docetaxel (23.4%) were the most common regimens. In third-line treatment, gemcitabine (18.9%) and capecitabine (18.2%) were the major regimens observed. Transition analyses demonstrated that the most frequently observed sequential treatment patterns from first- to third-line therapy consisted of anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide regimens followed by taxane-based therapies and subsequently capecitabine- or gemcitabine-based regimens. Among these, the most common treatment sequences were doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide → paclitaxel → capecitabine and epirubicin/cyclophosphamide → paclitaxel → capecitabine. Sankey diagram analyses showed substantial heterogeneity in treatment sequences among patients with mTNBC.
CONCLUSIONS: This study visualized real-world treatment sequences among Japanese patients with mTNBC. While anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide regimens were frequently followed by taxane-based therapies, diverse regimens including gemcitabine, capecitabine, and eribulin were commonly observed in later treatment lines. The treatment sequences identified in this study may serve as a foundation for future cost-effectiveness analyses and optimization of sequential treatment strategies.
METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted using the JMDC claims database in Japan. TNBC patients were identified using a proxy definition based on the use of TNBC-related anticancer agents and the absence of hormone receptor-targeted and HER2-targeted therapies. Metastatic patients were identified using ICD-10 codes (C77-C80). Drugs administered within the same month were treated as combination regimens, and first-, second-, and third-line therapies were constructed at the patient level. Treatment frequencies and transitions between treatment lines were summarized descriptively and visualized using Sankey diagrams.
RESULTS: In first-line treatment, epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (19.7%) and doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (16.4%) were the most frequently observed regimens. In second-line treatment, paclitaxel (29.9%) and docetaxel (23.4%) were the most common regimens. In third-line treatment, gemcitabine (18.9%) and capecitabine (18.2%) were the major regimens observed. Transition analyses demonstrated that the most frequently observed sequential treatment patterns from first- to third-line therapy consisted of anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide regimens followed by taxane-based therapies and subsequently capecitabine- or gemcitabine-based regimens. Among these, the most common treatment sequences were doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide → paclitaxel → capecitabine and epirubicin/cyclophosphamide → paclitaxel → capecitabine. Sankey diagram analyses showed substantial heterogeneity in treatment sequences among patients with mTNBC.
CONCLUSIONS: This study visualized real-world treatment sequences among Japanese patients with mTNBC. While anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide regimens were frequently followed by taxane-based therapies, diverse regimens including gemcitabine, capecitabine, and eribulin were commonly observed in later treatment lines. The treatment sequences identified in this study may serve as a foundation for future cost-effectiveness analyses and optimization of sequential treatment strategies.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2026-09, ISPOR Asia Pacific 2026, Bangkok, Thailand
Value in Health, Volume 55, Issue S1
Code
SA7
Topic
Study Approaches
Disease
SDC: Oncology