Cost-Effectiveness of Bivalent Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prefusion F (RSVpreF) Maternal Vaccine for Protection of Infants in the United States (US)
Speaker(s)
Averin A1, Quinn E1, Atwood M1, Weycker D1, Shea KM2, Law A2
1Avalere Health, Boston, MA, USA, 2Pfizer, New York, NY, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: RSVpreF was recently recommended by the US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for seasonal administration among pregnant persons between 32-36 weeks of gestation to protect their infants against lower respiratory tract illness due to respiratory syncytial virus (RSV-LRTI). We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of the current recommendation for maternal vaccination as well as hypothetical recommendations including expanded seasonal and year-round vaccination.
METHODS: Cost-effectiveness of alternative vaccination scenarios (vs. no intervention [NI]) was evaluated using a cohort model depicting clinical outcomes and economic costs of RSV-LRTI from birth to age 1 year as well as the lifetime consequences of RSV-related death. Vaccination scenarios included the current seasonal recommendation (September-January), expanded seasonal recommendations (August-January; June-February; May-February), and a year-round recommendation; monthly uptake among qualifying pregnant persons was 54.9%. Clinical outcomes included RSV-LRTI cases (by care setting), RSV-related deaths, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs); economic costs included medical care for RSV-LRTI, vaccine-related adverse events, vaccination/administration, and caregiver work loss. Costs (2023 US$) and QALYs were discounted at 3%/year.
RESULTS: Seasonal maternal vaccination (September-January vs. NI) reduced RSV-LRTI cases by 88,327 (hospital: 10,126; ambulatory: 78,201) and total costs by $35 million, and thus was cost saving (i.e., dominant). Expanding the vaccination timeframe further reduced RSV-LRTI cases (vs. seasonal) by 20% for August-January, 49% for June-February, 55% for May-February, and 58% for year-round. Cost per QALY (vs. NI) ranged from cost saving (August-January) to $60,388 (May-February) for expanded seasonal vaccination and was $79,230 for year-round vaccination.
CONCLUSIONS: Under the current ACIP recommendation, use of RSVpreF maternal vaccine is projected to yield substantive reductions in RSV-LRTI cases and total economic costs among US infants. Expanding the seasonal recommendation would yield additional public health benefits and represent a favorable economic investment.
Code
EE12
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Respiratory-Related Disorders (Allergy, Asthma, Smoking, Other Respiratory), Vaccines