Patients With Hepatitis Delta Virus Have Higher Economic Burden Than Hepatitis B Virus Mono-Infection: Results From a Large Healthcare Provider in Israel
Speaker(s)
Hazzan R1, Weil C2, Hoshen M3, Gazit S3, Tassa Liani O4, Green Y4, Rock M5, Kim C5
1Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Galilee, Israel, 2Maccabi Healthcare Services, Tel Aviv, TA, Israel, 3Maccabi Institute for Research & Innovation, Maccabi Healthcare Services, Tel Aviv, Israel, 4Gilead Sciences Israel Ltd, Hod Hasharon, Central District of Israel, Israel, 5Gilead Sciences, Foster City, CA, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: This study compares the healthcare resource use (HCRU) and costs among adult patients with HDV infection vs HBV mono-infection in a large healthcare provider in Israel.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using data from Maccabi Healthcare Services covering 1.8M adults in Israel. Diagnosis and laboratory data were used to identify HDV and HBV mono-infection (HBV-Mono) patients from 2005-2021. Adults with chronic HBV who had a Dx or positive HDV test were included in the HDV cohort (index date = HDV diagnosis). The HBV-Mono cohort comprised HBV patients tested for HDV (antibody/PCR test) without positive result or HDV diagnosis (index date = first HDV-negative result). Patients were continuously enrolled for ≥12 months pre-/post-index; patient characteristics were described at index date. All-cause HCRU and costs (using Israel Ministry of Health unit costs) per person per year were evaluated based on outpatient, inpatient and emergency room visits, and pharmacy purchases 12-months post-index using Chi-squared test and Wilcoxon rank sum test.
RESULTS: The study included 155 HDV and 2,420 HBV-Mono patients. Compared to HBV-Mono patients, HDV patients had lower socioeconomic status, and higher baseline prevalence rates for HIV (4.5% vs. 0.8%), HCV RNA+ (5.8% vs. 1.7%), and drug dependence (6.5% vs. 1.7%). More HDV patients had inpatient visits vs. HBV-Mono patients (20.6% vs. 12.0%; p=0.002), and HDV vs. HBV-Mono patients had longer median LOS for inpatient visits compared to (7.0 vs. 3.0 days; p =.0001). HDV patients had significantly greater inpatient costs ($2,240 vs $718; p<0.001), and significantly higher total costs ($5,293 vs $3,859; p=0.048).
CONCLUSIONS: In a large Israeli healthcare database, HDV patients had a greater rate of hospitalization, inpatient LOS and all-cause total healthcare costs compared to HBV-Mono patients. These findings highlight the need for effective HDV screening, diagnosis, and treatment, which may reduce its clinical and economic burden.
Code
EE34
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Disease
Gastrointestinal Disorders, Infectious Disease (non-vaccine), Rare & Orphan Diseases