Current Methods of Assessing Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in Informal Carers of Children With Rare Progressive Life-Limiting Conditions Are Inadequate: Findings From a Collaborative Project Hercules Workshop

Speaker(s)

Carlton J1, Powell P2, Peasgood T2, Chandler F3, Godfrey J4, Reuben E5
1University of Sheffield, Sheffield, YOR, UK, 2University of Sheffield, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK, 3Sanofi and Patient Advisory Board Lead, Duchenne UK, Middlesex, UK, 4JG Zebra Consulting, Hammersmith, UK, 5Duchenne UK, London, London, UK

OBJECTIVES: There are methodological challenges in assessing carer health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and incorporating this into economic models for health technology assessment (HTA). These challenges are magnified for informal carers of children living with rare, progressive, life-limiting conditions (RPLC). A recent multi-stakeholder collaborative workshop explored (i) how HRQoL of informal carers of children living with RPLC differed from a generic framework and (ii) research priorities to support future HTA submissions.

METHODS: Seven parent-carers of children with RPLC; seven industry representatives; and five clinical and regulatory representatives attended a collaborative workshop event. Discussions were facilitated within each group and focused on (i) defining HRQoL for informal carers of children with RPLC; and (ii) research priorities for generating evidence to support future HTA submissions. Whole-group discussions reflected on individual group considerations.

RESULTS: Parent-carers described how a bespoke (as opposed to generic) model was required to characterise HRQoL in informal caregivers of children with RPLC. This included stronger descriptive vocabulary (e.g., ‘despair’ instead of ‘hopelessness’) and the inclusion of attributes not normally captured (e.g., ‘anticipatory grief’ and ‘psychological exhaustion’). Research priorities for all attendees included qualitative research to better evidence unique impacts for this informal carer group; an understanding of change over time and affects on multiple family members; and methodological work to better understand how to model carer HRQoL in cost-effectiveness models.

CONCLUSIONS: A collaborative workshop empowering the voice of parent-carers and other key stakeholders suggests that a generic framework is insufficient for understanding HRQoL in informal carers of children living with RPLC. There is a gap in the evidence base on the HRQoL impacts in this group of informal caregivers. Focused qualitative studies, including those that investigate beyond the primary caregiver to include other family members, and methodological studies that enable appropriate incorporation of carer HRQoL data to HTA are needed.

Code

HTA365

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Health Technology Assessment, Methodological & Statistical Research, Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Decision & Deliberative Processes, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes, PRO & Related Methods

Disease

Pediatrics, Rare & Orphan Diseases