The Potential of Real-World Data (RWD) for Informing FDA Biosimliar and Interchangeable Biosimlar Regulatory Decisions: Recommendations From a Multi-Stakeholder Expert Panel

Speaker(s)

Lockhart C1, Bosco JL2, Li E3, Ling YL4, McCabe D5, McDermott C1, Walraven C6, Roth J7
1Biologics and Biosimilars Collective Intelligence Consortium, Alexandria, VA, USA, 2IQVIA, Cambridge, MA, USA, 3Sandoz Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA, 4Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA, 5Boehringer Ingelheim (Retired), Danbury, CT, USA, 6CVS Health, Blue Bell, PA, USA, 7Pfizer, Inc., New York, NY, USA

OBJECTIVES: U.S. Biosimilars are approved based on the totality of evidence, including molecular analysis and clinical studies. Our

objective was to engage a panel of biosimilar experts to explore utilizing RWD
to inform regulatory decisions of biosimilarity and interchangeability.

METHODS: We engaged nine individuals with expertise in biosimilar development, regulatory science, policy, and RWD. The panel completed pre-meeting questionnaires providing views and strategies for RWD, and then met for two, two-hour, moderated virtual meetings to uncover where and how to integrate RWD into the U.S. biosimlar regulatory process. Discussion transcripts were summarized into recommendations for adopting RWD in the regulatory process.

RESULTS: Questionnaire responses demonstrated general optimism for using RWD in regulatory approvals citing past successes and continually growing pools of rich data, but also concern for the quality and relevance for meeting FDA needs. These views were echoed in the panel discussion where they coalesced around a set of recommendations to advance RWD by building on successes and overcoming uncertainty in operationalizing regulatory-grade RWD: 1) advocate for continued education for manufacturers and regulators on appropriate uses of RWD to facilitate approvals without compromising evidentiary standards for assessing safety and effectiveness;

2) sponsors should engage early with FDA to proactively discuss proposed uses of RWD to inform study protocols; 3) continue efforts and investment in enriching existing data sources through linkages to better assess longitudinal clinical outcomes and changes in disease; 4) incentivize providers for data collection consistency and completeness; and 5) be innovative in leveraging foreign RWD through partnerships with countries in Europe and elsewhere where biosimliars have enjoyed broad utilization.

CONCLUSIONS: While challenges remain in using RWD in the U.S. regulatory context, the panel provided actionable recommendations in advancing RWD that could meet evidentiary needs, emphasizing operational improvements, methods development, and data enrichment to build on past success.

Code

RWD162

Topic

Real World Data & Information Systems, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Data Protection, Integrity, & Quality Assurance, Health & Insurance Records Systems, Reproducibility & Replicability, Surveys & Expert Panels

Disease

Biologics & Biosimilars, No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas