Operationalizing Life-Cycle HTA: A Tumor-Agnostic Precision Oncology Index Economic Evaluation From Canada
Speaker(s)
Cupples G, Krebs E, Weymann D, Regier D
BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
OBJECTIVES: Significant uncertainty in precision medicines, driven by small benefitting populations and heterogeneity in tumor-agnostic indications, challenge reimbursement deliberations in health technology assessments (HTA). Life-cycle HTA aims to generate real-world evidence to manage this uncertainty, and requires an index economic model to establish how estimated cost effectiveness evolves as new evidence emerges. We developed an open-source index economic evaluation of entrectinib, a tumor-agnostic therapy with conditional market authorization. We aimed to replicate the HTA revisions to a sponsor-submitted economic evaluation, from publicly available information, to support life-cycle decision making.
METHODS: We used partitioned survival analysis to determine tumor-agnostic and tumor-specific cost effectiveness, adhering to best-practice recommendations. We utilized publicly-available HTA reviews for parameterization and estimated incremental costs from a healthcare payer perspective (2021 Canadian dollars), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) and incremental net monetary benefit (INMB). We assessed the impact of diagnostic tests, and derived a decision algorithm for identifying the most cost-effective tumor indications.
RESULTS: One third of parameters (n=30) were unavailable in the Canadian reimbursement review and were sourced from international reviews. Tumor-agnostic incremental costs $69,723 (95% CI: $37,741, $94,125) and QALYs 0.13 (-0.39, 0.41) yielded INMB -$56,501 at a willingness to pay of $100,000/QALY. Inclusion of companion diagnostic testing costs diminished expected value (INMB CAD -2,364,520 at 100,000/QALY). Heterogeneity was considerable across tumor indications with treatment for advanced lung cancer providing the greatest value (INMB: -$24,772 at $100,000/QALY).
CONCLUSIONS: Our open-source tumor-agnostic analysis found the value of entrectinib varied substantially across tumor indications. Opaque reporting in HTA reimbursement reviews impeded our ability to establish a trustworthy index economic model to operationalize life-cycle HTA. Open science models and refinement of best practice guidelines for tumor-agnostic evaluations are urgently needed to address precision medicine uncertainty and support continued patient access decisions for conditionally approved therapies.
Code
HTA356
Topic
Economic Evaluation, Health Technology Assessment, Organizational Practices
Topic Subcategory
Best Research Practices, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Decision & Deliberative Processes
Disease
Oncology, Personalized & Precision Medicine