Investigation of Nutritional Status: Eating Habits of Workers With Different Work Schedules

Speaker(s)

Pergel M1, Kovács B1, Polyák É1, Pusztafalvi H1, Karácsony I2, Szabó L2, Boncz I3, Pakai A4
1University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary, 2University of Pécs Faculty of Health Sciences, Szombathely, Hungary, 3University of Pécs, Pécs, BA, Hungary, 4University of Pécs Faculty of Health Sciences, Szombathely, ZA, Hungary

OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to get a comprehensive picture of the eating habits and the nutritional status of employees with different working patterns. It was important to find out about their eating facilities, whether they could eat during working hours, whether they had hot meals, whether they had a separate dining area.

METHODS: A quantitative, cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted in Hungary using internet social networking sites among active workers aged 18-65 years, it was available between 12/12/2022-24/02/2023. Data were collected using a self-designed questionnaire which included questions on sociodemographic data, work performance, nutritional- and health status, dietary habits, and self-designed questionnaire on dietary frequency. The respondents were divided into two groups: those who work shifts and those who do not. The data were analysed using Microsoft Excel software, descriptive statistical analysis, the CHI² test and the T-test for hypothesis testing. The level of significance was set at p<0.05.

RESULTS: Most respondents (61%) indicated that they worked non-shift work, while 39% worked some shift work. The mean age was 36.13 years. The work schedule did not influence whether the workplace had a separate eating area (p=0.275; MT=47.79%-69.77%). Schedule did not determine the workers' varied diet (p=0.55; MT=71.45%-88.55%), nor did the consumption of caffeinated drinks (p=0.83; MT=1.80-2.44) or snacking habits (p=0.54; MT=35.93%-63.11%). Work schedule as a factor had an effect on weight gain (p=0.02; MT=25.90-28.16), but did not influence the development of digestive problems (p=0.26; MT=14.93%-53.73%). Bringing home-prepared lunch to work resulted more snacking (p=0.04; MT=26.81%-57.41%).

CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the nutritional habits of the work schedules are almost identical, and work schedules have no effect on most dietary habits but do influence nutritional status. We see an opportunity for an extended study with more attention to the inclusion of work schedules, and to investigate circadian rhythms.

Code

PCR199

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Methodological & Statistical Research, Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Clinician Reported Outcomes, Patient Behavior and Incentives, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes, Survey Methods

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Nutrition