Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) Recipients: A 30 Year Analysis From the Island of Crete

Speaker(s)

Pateromichelakis T1, Koutalas E1, Kallergis E1, Mavrakis H1, Fanourgiakis J2, Kochiadakis G1, Kanoupakis E1
1University Hospital, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 2Hellenic Mediterranean University, Department of Management Science and Technology, Heraklion, 91, Greece

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs) are critical devices for managing patients at risk of sudden cardiac death. This study aims to analyze the demographic characteristics and clinical details of patients who received ICDs in Crete, utilizing data from a regional registry.

METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted using the ICD registry of Crete, encompassing data from 1993 to 2023. The registry included information on patient demographics, including age, gender, comorbidities, the results of electrophysiology studies, indications for ICD implantation (primary vs. secondary prevention), the type of ICD (single-chamber, dual-chamber, or CRT), and the number of device replacements.

RESULTS: A total of 1917 patients were included in the study. The majority of the patients were male (87.8% vs 12.2% female). The primary indication for ICD implantation was primary prevention, accounting for 77.8% of the cases. Most of these patients (55.5%) suffered of ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), while non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM) accounted for 26.9%. Electrophysiology study was performed in 73.1% of the patients; 34.5% of these were not inducible, sustained ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) was induced in 46.3% and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) in 19.2%, respectively. Single-chamber ICDs were implanted in 36.5% of patients, dual-chamber in 54.6%, and CRT in 8.9%. A notable 32.7% of the patients underwent at least one device replacement.

CONCLUSIONS: The demographic profile of ICD recipients in Crete indicates a predominance of males with ICM. The results highlight the diversity in patient substrates, electrophysiological study outcomes, and the types and replacements of ICDs used. These findings underscore the importance of personalized care and follow-up for this high-risk population. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes and the effectiveness of ICDs in different demographic subsets.

Code

EPH231

Topic

Epidemiology & Public Health

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders (including MI, Stroke, Circulatory), Medical Devices