Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Abrocitinib Versus Dupilumab in Adolescents With Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Spain

Speaker(s)

De Lossada Juste A1, Fortes P1, Bellmunt A2, Vidal Vilar N3
1Pfizer S.L.U., Alcobendas, Madrid, Spain, 2Outcomes'10 S.L., Castellón, Castellón, Spain, 3Outcomes'10 S.L., CASTELLON, CS, Spain

OBJECTIVES: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, inflammatory skin disease characterized by itchy, painful, and dry skin, with a prevalence of around 6.43% in adolescent patients in Spain. This analysis aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of abrocitinib (100 and 200 mg) versus dupilumab in the treatment of adolescent patients (12-17 years) with severe AD who are candidates for systemic treatments, from the Spanish National Health System (NHS) perspective.

METHODS: A hybrid model consisting of a decision-tree (52-weeks) followed by a Markov model (6-month cycles) was developed. In the decision-tree, patients started treatment, and response (75% reduction in baseline Eczema Area and Severity Index score, EASI-75) and discontinuation rates were assessed at weeks 16 and 52. In the Markov model (remainder of the 5-year time horizon), three health states were considered: maintenance with active treatment, subsequent treatment (in case of discontinuation or loss of response), and death. Efficacy and utility data were obtained from the literature. Unit costs (€, 2023 values) for drug acquisition and administration, adverse events, testing, medical visits, hospitalisations, and subsequent treatment, were obtained from local sources. The analysis was stated as incremental cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. To evaluate the robustness of the model, deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were carried out.

RESULTS: Abrocitinib (100 and 200 mg) was dominant (lower incremental costs and higher incremental benefit) versus dupilumab, generating a QALYs gain of 0.02 and 0.10 per-patient with cost savings of €8,589, and €9,520, respectively. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the model. According to the PSA, abrocitinib was dominant in 70.7% and 80.7% of the simulations for the 100 mg and 200 mg presentation compared to dupilumab, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: From the Spanish NHS perspective, abrocitinib is a dominant alternative versus dupilumab in the treatment of adolescents with severe AD.

Code

EE522

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Sensory System Disorders (Ear, Eye, Dental, Skin), Systemic Disorders/Conditions (Anesthesia, Auto-Immune Disorders (n.e.c.), Hematological Disorders (non-oncologic), Pain)