Cost-Effectiveness of Dostarlimab Monotherapy for the Second-Line Treatment of Advanced or Recurrent dMMR/MSI-H Endometrial Cancer Patients Previously Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Spain

Speaker(s)

Iglesias M1, Manzano A2, Pérez D3, Vinuesa-Hernando JM4, Pérez-Troncoso D5, Vidal Vilar N6, Ferro M7
1Medical Oncology Intercenter Unit, Regional and Virgen de la Victoria University Hospitals, IBIMA, Málaga, Málaga, Spain, 2Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Doce de Octubre, Madrid, Spain, 3Pharmacy Department, Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain, 4Pharmacy Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain, 5Outcomes'10 S.L., Seville, SE, Spain, 6Outcomes'10 S.L., CASTELLON, CS, Spain, 7GSK Spain, Madrid, M, Spain

OBJECTIVES: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the fourth most common malignancy among women in Spain, with an incidence of 13-14/100,000 annually. It usually appears post-menopause, and most cases are diagnosed early. However, 20% of patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage, where the 5-year survival rate is only 20%. In these cases, first-line treatment is typically carboplatin and paclitaxel, and until dostarlimab, no second-line therapy was indicated for these patients. This study evaluates cost-effectiveness of dostarlimab versus current alternatives (CA) for 2L EC dMMR/MSI-H patients from the Spanish National Health System perspective.

METHODS: A partitioned survival model with three states (progression-free survival, progressed disease, and death) was used, including a cohort of dMMR/MSI-H (mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability high) EC patients. Dostarlimab efficacy was modelled using data from the GARNET trial. Survival curves of similar patients were used to model the efficacy of CA (real-world treatments from UK´s National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service database). Spanish costs for screening, treatment, disease management and monitoring, subsequent treatments, and adverse events (€, 2023) were considered. Utilities and adverse events disutilities were extracted from the literature. Costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were computed for both arms over the patients' lifetime horizon, and probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted.

RESULTS: Patients treated with CA had 0.9 QALYs with a cost of 15,278€, while those treated with dostarlimab had 5.3 QALYs (+4.4 QALYs) with a cost of 176,446 € (+161,168€), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 36,403€/QALY. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed a mean ICER of 37,815€/QALY.

CONCLUSIONS: Dostarlimab provides nearly six-times of CA QALYs with acceptable incremental costs, making it cost-effective when considering a threshold of €60,000/QALY (previously used with oncology treatments in Spain). This suggests that dostarlimab is a valuable treatment option for 2L dMMR/MSI-H EC patients in terms of efficacy and economic viability.

Code

EE457

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Epidemiology & Public Health

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Public Health, Trial-Based Economic Evaluation

Disease

Oncology, Reproductive & Sexual Health