Effectiveness and Safety of Avelumab First-Line Maintenance (1LM) in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (la/mUC): A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and Meta-Analysis (MA)
Speaker(s)
Kearney M1, Musat M2, Moradian H2, Barthélémy P3
1Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, HE, Germany, 2Cytel, Waltham, MA, USA, 3Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg, France
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Avelumab 1LM is widely recommended by guidelines for patients with la/mUC who did not progress after 1L platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) based on the JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial. While trial data remains the gold standard for evaluating therapies, real-world evidence (RWE) provides insights for the clinical practice in a broader population. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of avelumab 1LM from the most recent RWE studies.
METHODS: An SLR was conducted for observational studies in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane (01/01/2020-31/01/2024), with no language restrictions. Landmark 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) and 1-year overall survival (OS), measured from avelumab 1LM start, were included in MA.
RESULTS: Overall, 45 studies were identified, encompassing 2656 patients treated with avelumab 1LM, most often from the US (15/45), EU5 (14/45), and Japan (5/45). Across studies, patients’ mean age was 71 years and majority were male (78%) and had an ECOG performance score (PS) of 0-1 (81%). On average, 26%, 14%, and 25% had upper tract tumors, liver, and lung metastases, respectively. More than half of patients received second-line (2L) treatment (55%) after avelumab 1LM. The most common 2L therapy was enfortumab vedotin (36% of patients). Median OS from avelumab start varied between 10.6 (range 3.4-15.5) to 26.2 months (95%CI 19.97-not estimable). In the MA, 1-year PFS and OS rates (95% CI) from avelumab 1LM start were 39% (35%-44%) and 69% (65%-73%), respectively. Rates of grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) and discontinuation due to AEs were low (median 8% and 9% across studies, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness and safety of avelumab 1LM was consistent with those seen in JAVELIN Bladder 100, despite data heterogeneity and limited follow-up. Global RWE supports the established clinical benefit seen with avelumab 1LM in a broad range of patients, such as older pts and those with high metastatic tumor burden or ECOG PS>1.
Code
CO68
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Study Approaches
Topic Subcategory
Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Literature Review & Synthesis
Disease
Oncology, Urinary/Kidney Disorders