Cost-Effectiveness of Adjuvant Nivolumab in Adults With High-Risk Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma (MIUC) With Tumor Cell-Pd-L1-Expression ≥ 1% in Austria

Speaker(s)

Voit M1, Eichhober G1, Walter E1, Ni L2, Knight C3, Teitsson S4, Patel M5, Boehler CE6
1Institute for Pharmaeconomic Research, Vienna, Austria, 2RTI Health Solutions, Manchester, UK, 3Independent consultant, Sheffield, UK, 4Bristol Myers Squibb, Denham, LON, UK, 5Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA, 6Bristol Myers Squibb, Vienna, Austria

OBJECTIVES: One of the most common malignant tumors is urinary bladder carcinoma which accounts for approximately 3%-4% of all malignant cancers. MIUC is a subtype of urinary bladder carcinoma. Standard-of-care treatment for most patients with MIUC are radical cystectomy and associated lymph node resection. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of adjuvant nivolumab versus observation in adult MIUC patients with tumor cell-PD-L1-expression ≥ 1% and with a high risk of recurrence after radical resection of MIUC in Austria.

METHODS: A three health-state (disease free, recurrent, and death) Markov cohort model with a lifetime horizon of 30 years and a cycle length of seven days was adapted to the Austrian context. Clinical data were taken from CheckMate 274, a phase 3 clinical trial. Resource utilization and direct costs (2024 €) were derived from published sources using the Austrian payer’s perspective. A willingness-to-pay threshold of 40,000€ per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained was incorporated. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed. Costs were discounted at 5%, while QALYs and life-years (LYs) were discounted at 3% annually.

RESULTS: Base case cost over a lifetime horizon for nivolumab and observation were 90,859€ and 46,486€, respectively, leading to incremental cost of nivolumab of 44,373€. Compared to observation, nivolumab was associated with an incremental gain of 2.11 QALYs (6.79 versus 4.68). This led to an incremental cost-utility ratio of 21,046€. In a Monte Carlo PSA with 1,000 second-order simulations, nivolumab versus observation was cost-effective in approximately 92% of all cases.

CONCLUSIONS: In Austria, adjuvant nivolumab in adult MIUC patients with tumor cell-PD-L1-expression ≥ 1% and with a high risk of recurrence after radical resection of MIUC is a cost-effective therapy option which leads to a significantly longer disease-free survival compared to observation.

Code

EE209

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Decision Modeling & Simulation

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Oncology