Budget Impact Analysis of Cenobamate for Epilepsy Patients With Drug-Resistant Focal Onset Seizures in the Netherlands
Speaker(s)
Li N1, Majoie M2, Evers S3, Rijkers K4, Gubler F5, Rouhl R4, Lazeron R2, Klarenbeek PK5, Laskier V6, Hiligsmann M1
1Maastricht University, Maastricht, LI, Netherlands, 2Epilepsy Center Kempenhaeghe, Heeze, North Brabant, Netherlands, 3Maastricht University / Trimbos Institute, Maastricht / Utrecht, Limburg, Netherlands, 4Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands, 5Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, Limburg, Netherlands, 6FIECON | Health Economics consultancy, London, Hertfordshire, UK
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: To explore the financial consequences of adopting cenobamate as a treatment alternative in epilepsy patients with drug-resistant focal onset seizures (FOS) from a societal perspective in the Netherlands.
METHODS: A previous budget impact model with a 5-year time horizon was adapted to the Dutch setting accounting for the eligible population, real-world market shares, treatment effectiveness and resource use in two scenarios: cenobamate with constant market share versus cenobamate with linearly increased market share up to 20%. Clinical inputs included treatment response, seizure reduction and adverse events. Costs consisted of drugs, medical and non-medical costs. One-way sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis were conducted to test the robustness of our results.
RESULTS: 14,723 patients were eligible for cenobamate in 2022. Although cenobamate adds €12,686,307 on the drug budget over 5 years, the reduction due to the replacement of three other drugs yields a total impact on the drug budget of €3,722,596. Adopting cenobamate resulted in a medical cost saving of €13,622,208 due to less resource use. Non-medical cost saving of €22,144,054 was associated with reductions in productivity due to focal epilepsy. Overall, savings generated at medical and non-medical cost level offset the impact of cenobamate on the drug budget, resulting in a budget saving of €32,043,665 over 5 years. Results were robust in the sensitivity/scenario analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with cenobamate is associated with both medical and non-medical cost savings, which offset the increase in drug budget and result in a significant potential budget saving. The higher the market share of cenobamate, the larger the budget savings. We acknowledge several limitations; Complex scenarios such as drug interactions, stopping/switching drugs, and multiple drug use were not taken into account. The long-term efficacy and safety of cenabamate and its comparators remains uncertain. Future real-world data are needed to confirm our findings.
Code
EE297
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Budget Impact Analysis
Disease
Drugs, Neurological Disorders