Impact of Single-Pill Combinations and Level of Adherence on Healthcare Costs in Italian Hypertensive Patients Treated With Perindopril-Based Regimens

Speaker(s)

Savarese G1, Vintila AM2, Degli Esposti L3, Dovizio M4, Magne J5, Masi S6, Nugnes M3, Veronesi C3, Wolf J7
1Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden, 2Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy,, Bucharest, Romania, 3CliCon S.r.l. Società Benefit Health, Economics & Outcomes Research, Bologna, BO, Italy, 4CliCon S.r.l. Società Benefit Health, Economics & Outcomes Research, Bologna, Italy, 5University Hospital of Limoges, Limoges, Nouvelle-Aquitaine, France, 6University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, PI, Italy, 7Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Pomeranian Voivodeship, Poland

OBJECTIVES: Hypertension guidelines recommend initiation and up-titration of anti-hypertensives with single-pill combinations (SPC) to reduce pill burden and improve adherence. Using Italian real-world data, we aim to evaluate and compare healthcare resources utilization and costs (HRUC) among patients on perindopril-based anti-hypertensive therapy (PER-b) classified by formulation type (SPC vs. free-equivalent, FEC) and by adherence level.

METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed using administrative databases, covering 6.7 million Italians health-assisted during 2010-2021, including hypertensive adults with dual or triple PER-b prescriptions. Adherence, measured by the proportion of days covered (PDC), was categorized as low (<40%), moderate (40%-<80%), or high (≥80%). Mean HRUC per subject per year were calculated. A Generalized Linear Model (GLM) evaluated cost correlations, adjusted for confounders like age, gender, prior treatments, comorbidities, and pill burden.

RESULTS: 1,458 patients on FEC and 22,663 on SPC were included. High adherence was more common in SPC group (75.5%) compared to FEC group (32.0%) (p<0.001). During follow-up, SPC users had fewer numbers of all-cause hospitalizations (all-hosp) (mean±SD 0.2±0.5 vs. 0.4±0.7; p<0.001), cardiovascular hospitalizations (mean±SD 0.04±0.10 vs. 0.09±0.20; p<0.001), drug prescriptions dispensed (mean±SD 15.7±9.4 vs. 19.7±11.1; p<0.001), and reduced use of outpatient services (specialist visits/laboratory tests, mean±SD 4.1±4.7 vs. 4.6±5.2; p<0.001) than FEC users. Mean annual healthcare costs (considering drug prescriptions dispensed, all-hosp and outpatient services) were significantly lower for the SPC vs. FEC group (€2,077±3,212 vs. €2,892±4,271; p<0.001). Higher adherence was associated with lower healthcare costs (€2,056±2,923 for PDC≥80% vs. €2,576±4,555 for PDC<40%; p<0.05). GLM analysis confirmed higher costs for FEC and lower costs for adherent patients, with FEC increasing costs by €243 per patient/year compared to SPC.

CONCLUSIONS: SPC regimen appears to be associated with lower healthcare expenditure than FEC regimens. High adherence significantly reduces HRUC, emphasizing the importance of strategies to improve patient compliance with anti-hypertensive therapy.

Code

RWD26

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Patient-Centered Research, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Adherence, Persistence, & Compliance, Budget Impact Analysis

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders (including MI, Stroke, Circulatory)