Difficulties of Choosing Proper Endpoints in Anti-Obesity Therapy Assessment

Speaker(s)

Holownia-Voloskova M1, Czech M2, Franek E3
1Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, n/a, Poland, 2The Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland, 3Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Internal Affairs in Warsaw, Warsaw, n/a, Poland

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: To explore the challenges associated with selecting appropriate endpoints in the assessment of anti-obesity therapies, considering the multifactorial nature of obesity and the diverse impacts of treatment modalities.

METHODS: A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted, focusing on clinical trials and observational studies evaluating anti-obesity therapies. The review included studies published in peer-reviewed journals between 2000 and 2023. Key endpoints such as weight loss, metabolic health, quality of life, and adverse events were analyzed. Additionally, expert opinions and guidelines from regulatory bodies were examined to understand the rationale behind endpoint selection.

RESULTS: The review identified several challenges in endpoint selection. Weight loss, a commonly used primary endpoint, does not capture the full spectrum of benefits and risks associated with anti-obesity treatments. Metabolic health markers, such as blood glucose and lipid levels, provide crucial insights into the physiological impact of treatments but may not reflect overall health improvements. Quality of life measures are essential for understanding patient-centered outcomes but are often subjective and difficult to standardize. Moreover, the variability in patient responses and the influence of external factors like diet and physical activity complicate endpoint determination. Regulatory requirements often prioritize short-term efficacy endpoints, potentially overlooking long-term health benefits and safety profiles.

CONCLUSIONS: Selecting appropriate endpoints for anti-obesity therapy assessment is complex and requires a multifaceted approach. A combination of weight loss, metabolic health indicators, quality of life assessments, and safety profiles should be considered to provide a comprehensive evaluation of treatment efficacy. Future research should focus on developing standardized, holistic endpoints that encompass the broad impact of anti-obesity therapies on patient health and well-being. Collaborative efforts between clinicians, researchers, and regulatory bodies are crucial to establish robust guidelines that reflect the diverse needs of patients undergoing anti-obesity treatment.

Code

HTA46

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Outcomes Assessment

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders (including obesity)