Real-World Treatment Patterns in Patients With Biochemical Recurrence After Local Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Retrospective Analysis of a Large US Database
Speaker(s)
Shore ND1, Khan N2, McKay RR3, Chen G2, Constantinovici N4, Hlebec V4, Srinivasan S2, Vassilev Z2, Spratt DE5
1Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA, 2Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Whippany, NJ, USA, 3University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA, 4Bayer Consumer Care AG, Basel, Switzerland, 5University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Following radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiation therapy (RT) for prostate cancer (PC), patients variably develop biochemical recurrence (BCR), defined as rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Here we describe real-world (RW) treatment patterns in patients with BCR by risk status, defined by PSA doubling time (PSADT).
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used nationally representative Optum© electronic medical records (7/2012–9/2022) to identify adults with PC who developed BCR (PSA ≥0.2 ng/mL after RP; PSA ≥“nadir + 2 ng/mL” after RT) and had ≥6 months of follow-up data after BCR. PSADT <12 vs ≥12 months defined high- or low-risk BCR, respectively; a 9-month cutoff was used in a sensitivity analysis.
RESULTS: Overall, 3588 patients met criteria for BCR; 29%/41% had high-/low-risk BCR (30% had missing PSADT or undetermined risk status). Median (range) age at BCR was 67 (37–88) years; 83%/14% were White/Black; median (Q1–Q3) follow-up was 31 (18–51) months. Treatment post-BCR was received by 60% with high-risk vs 53% with low-risk BCR. After RP (n=2891), subsequent RT (high-risk, 41%; low-risk, 41%), androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) monotherapy (high-risk, 30%; low-risk, 23%) and ADT + androgen receptor pathway inhibitor ([ARPI], including enzalutamide, apalutamide, darolutamide, or abiraterone, or 1st generation ARI bicalutamide: high-risk, 18%; low-risk, 7%) were commonly used. After RT (n=697), ADT monotherapy (high-risk, 23%; low-risk, 12%) and ADT + ARPI (high-risk, 18%; low-risk 8%) were commonly used. Bicalutamide was the most common 1st generation ARI or ARPI in both cohorts. The sensitivity analysis showed similar results.
CONCLUSIONS: Many patients with high-risk BCR did not receive treatment for BCR; of those who did, subsequent RT or ADT monotherapy were most common, followed by ADT + ARPI. Patients and caregivers should discuss available treatment options and weigh individual risks and benefits at first sign of BCR in PC.
Code
CO30
Topic
Clinical Outcomes
Topic Subcategory
Clinical Outcomes Assessment
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Oncology