Use of Real-World Evidence to Support Regulatory Clearance of a Labeling Revision for Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in the United States

Speaker(s)

Gibbs L1, Govil P1, Baglivo A1, Kreaden U2, Wong JA2, Lenis D3, Garry E1
1Aetion, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 2Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA, 3Aetion, Inc., NY, NY, USA

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: Use real-world evidence (RWE) to support regulatory clearance for a labeling revision for a robotic-assisted surgical device (RASD) for radical prostatectomy (RP) by evaluating its non-inferiority relative to non-RASD RP with respect to long-term overall survival (OS).

METHODS: This work was as part of the implementation process for developing the National Evaluation System for health Technology Mark (the “NEST Mark”), an initiative of a cooperative agreement with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Medical Device Innovation Consortium through the NEST to advance the innovative use of RWE. Males aged ≥35 years with treatment-naive prostate cancer and a RASD or open (non-RASD) RP procedure code between 7/1/2007 and 12/31/2014 were selected from Optum’s de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database of claims with linked mortality data. OS was defined as the absence of a reported death evaluated from the day after RP until the end of the follow-up period (e.g., 5 years for 5-year OS) or 12/31/2019 (end of study period) using a Kaplan-Meier approach after propensity score stratification in quintiles. Non-inferiority was assessed with a margin of 2% and test size of 2.5%.

RESULTS: Among the patients undergoing RP via RASD (N=18,949) versus non-RASD (N=5,401) approach, unadjusted OS was not worse at 5 (96.13% vs. 95.65%) through 10 years (89.18% vs. 87.31%). Adjusted differences were 0.20% (95% CI: -0.46%, 0.86%) for 5-year and 0.88% (95% CI: -0.35%, 2.11%) for 10-year OS probabilities, demonstrating non-inferiority for both (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS: In this collaborative demonstration case, RWE was successful in supporting United States regulatory clearance for a labeling revision for the da Vinci Xi/X Ⓡ Surgical System to modify a precaution statement about a lack of FDA’s evaluation of overall survival after RP for the treatment of prostate cancer.

Code

HPR24

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory

Topic Subcategory

Approval & Labeling

Disease

Medical Devices, Oncology, Surgery