Feasibility of Using Finnish Real-World Data to Build an External Control Arm for the Factor Xia Inhibitor Asundexian Pacific-AF Trial

Speaker(s)

Potts J1, Laapas K2, Khorlo I3, Niemela P2, Strom S2, Partanen L2, Kurki S2, Viethen T1, Abdelgawwad K3, Leinonen J2
1Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Whippany, NJ, USA, 2Bayer Oy (Finland), Espoo, Finland, 3Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether Finnish-Real World Data (F-RWD) can be used as an External Control Arm (ECA) to the PACIFIC-AF trial. PACIFIC-AF (phase 2b) compared the safety of the oral FXIa inhibitor asundexian to apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS: The Finnish healthcare system was used as data source to develop an ECA and test novel approaches for clinical trials. PACIFIC-AF randomized participants to one of two asundexian arms (20mg or 50mg) or to the Internal Control Arm (ICA) for a 12-week period. The primary endpoint for the PACIFIC-AF trial was the ratio of the proportions of the composite of International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding within 3 months. Participants treated with apixaban and fulfilling eligibility for PACIFIC-AF were identified in F-RWD; participants were then matched to the PACIFIC-AF ICA using propensity-score (PS) matching with a common-support region. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) across 28 pre-specified baseline confounders, descriptive statistics and Aalen-Johansen curves were used to compare ECA and PACIFIC-AF ICA.

RESULTS: ICA (n=250) and ECA (n=239) were established from an eligible F-RWD pool (n=1763). Confounders were well-balanced between ICA and ECA, with the largest discrepancy being prior use of heparins (22.0% vs 27.6%), respectively. The composite bleeding outcome occurred in 6 participants compared to 9 participants in the ECA, the cumulative incidence was 2.4 (90% CI 1.16 - 4.42) versus 3.88 (90% CI 2.12 - 6.26). Sensitivity analyses, consisting of PS-weighting approaches, provided similar but improved matching results.

CONCLUSIONS: The F-RWD was successfully used to build an ECA that showed baseline and outcome overlap with the PACIFIC-AF ICA. Sensitivity analyses showed improvement over the pre-specified primary approach, suggesting a gate-keeping approach to PS-matching and/or weighting methods to be used to establish the most efficient ECA while maintaining pre-specification of methods.

Code

MSR34

Topic

Methodological & Statistical Research, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Trials, Confounding, Selection Bias Correction, Causal Inference

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders (including MI, Stroke, Circulatory), No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas