Cost Effectiveness of Novel Antiobiotic Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam in Gram Negative Infections in Greece

Speaker(s)

Yfantopoulos N1, Bafaloukos I2, Ntontsi P2, Yang J3, Mintzia E2, Skroumpelos A2, Karokis A4
1MSD Greece, Alimos, A1, Greece, 2MSD Greece, Alimos, Greece, 3Merck & Co., Rahway, NJ, USA, 4MSD Greece, Athens, Greece

Presentation Documents

BACKGROUND:Antimicrobial resistance is a critical public health issue. Greece has the second highest percentage of antimicrobial resistance in the European Union reporting an endemic of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales infections like K. pneumonia producing KPC.

OBJECTIVES: The present study assesses the cost-effectiveness of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (Imi/Rel) for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI), complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) including pielonephritis, and hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP) caused by carbapenem resistant (CR) Gram-negative (GN) bacteria in Greece.

METHODS: The adaptation was performed from the payer’s perspective. The model includes data from the RESTORE-IMI-1 trial and consists of two parts: a decision-tree, depicting the period from diagnosis to hospital discharge and a Markov model, projecting long-term outcomes and costs following hospital discharge. The model includes a population of patients distributed among three afore-mentioned disease categories with confirmed CR-pathogens. The model projects costs and outcomes within a 45-years’ time horizon, costs and LYs are discounted at an annual rate of 3.5%. Outcomes included Life Years (LY’s) as well as resource use and mortality for each comparator . A deterministic sensitivity analysis (DSA) was performed to identify the input parameters impact on ICER, and a Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis (PSA) was run to examine the robustness against collective uncertainty of all parameters. Comparators in the model include piperacillin-Tazobactam (pip/tazo) and imipenem/cilastatin (Imi).

RESULTS:

Imi gives 18.14, Pip/Tazo gives 20 additional LY’s whereas Imi/Rel yields 22 LY’s. Imi/Rel showed an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 1812€ per LY gained compared to Pip/Tazo and 211€ per LY gained compared to imi. The PSA showed in 94.5% of the 5,000 simulations imi/rel being cost-effective versus Imi under the Greek willingness-to-pay threshold of 52,770 €/QALY.

CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that Imi/Rel is a cost-effective treatment option for patients with (cIAI), (cUTI), and (HABP/VABP) caused by CR GN bacteria in Greece.

Code

EE248

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation, Epidemiology & Public Health

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Novel & Social Elements of Value, Public Health

Disease

SDC: Infectious Disease (non-vaccine)